PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAAA vs. TFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAAA vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAAA achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than TFLO's 1.59% return.


JAAA

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.45%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
6.71%
5Y*
4.79%
10Y*

TFLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.92%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
2.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAAA vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
1.87%5.16%7.43%8.59%0.49%1.39%0.79%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
1.59%4.22%5.34%5.12%1.99%-0.02%-0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between JAAA and TFLO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2020

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAAA vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAAA
JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

TFLO
TFLO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAAA vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAAATFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-40.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.69

13.94

-11.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.07

201.22

-188.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

70.18

823.26

-753.09

JAAA vs. TFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAAA Sharpe Ratio is 5.98, which is lower than the TFLO Sharpe Ratio of 14.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAAA and TFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAAATFLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.98

14.09

-8.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.87

10.30

-7.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

5.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.77

0.99

+1.79

Drawdowns

JAAA vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAAA drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, smaller than the maximum TFLO drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAAA and TFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAAATFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-5.01%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.39%

-0.02%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.46%

-0.04%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.64%

-0.13%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-0.10%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.00%

+0.07%

Volatility

JAAA vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) has a higher volatility of 0.13% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.07%. This indicates that JAAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAAATFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

0.07%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.64%

0.20%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85%

0.28%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.68%

0.35%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.64%

0.46%

+1.18%

JAAA vs. TFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAAA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TFLO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JAAA vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison

JAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than TFLO's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
5.00%5.30%6.35%6.11%2.74%1.21%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
3.90%4.16%5.21%4.88%1.68%0.00%0.36%2.08%1.65%0.86%0.31%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAAA and TFLO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JAAA has higher volatility (0.13%) compared to TFLO (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAAA dropped -2.64% vs TFLO's -5.01%.

On 5-year performance, JAAA leads with 4.79% vs 3.63% for TFLO. On fees, TFLO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JAAA has performed better with a 4.79% return vs 3.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TFLO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JAAA.

JAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 3.90% for TFLO.

JAAA is categorized as CLO, while TFLO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JAAA and 0.15% for TFLO.

TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.09 vs 5.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAAA and TFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer