JAAA vs. QIS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) and QIS (Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while QIS is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JAAA returned 6.18%/yr vs -26.24%/yr for QIS. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JAAA charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for QIS.

Performance

JAAA vs. QIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAAA achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly higher than QIS's -36.27% return.

JAAA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 2.03%
• YTD: 2.62%
• 1Y: 4.91%
• 3Y*: 6.18%
• 5Y*: 4.89%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.53%

QIS

• 1D: -6.37%
• 1M: -3.62%
• 6M: -36.80%
• YTD: -36.27%
• 1Y: -51.61%
• 3Y*: -26.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -25.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	$270.67M	$249.72M	$261.40M
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF	$7.85K	$6.92K	$24.22K

JAAA vs. QIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	2.62%	5.16%	7.43%	4.59%
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF	-36.27%	-38.02%	0.19%	2.08%

Correlation

The correlation between JAAA and QIS is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2023	0.11

Return for Risk

JAAA vs. QIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JAAA

JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 99
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

QIS

QIS Risk / Return Rank: 0
QIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
QIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
QIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1
QIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
QIS Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JAAA vs. QIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JAAA	QIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.23	-1.28	+7.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	10.27	-2.04	+12.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.86	0.77	+2.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.71	-0.95	+13.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	69.11	-1.65	+70.76

JAAA vs. QIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAAA Sharpe Ratio is 6.23, which is higher than the QIS Sharpe Ratio of -1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAAA and QIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JAAA vs. QIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAAA drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, smaller than the maximum QIS drawdown of -62.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAAA and QIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	JAAA	QIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.64%	-62.82%	+60.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.39%	-54.47%	+54.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.46%	-62.82%	+61.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-62.64%	+62.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.24%	-16.11%	+15.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.07%	31.32%	-31.25%

Volatility

JAAA vs. QIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) is 0.13%, while Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) has a volatility of 15.75%. This indicates that JAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JAAA	QIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.13%	15.75%	-15.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.61%	33.30%	-32.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79%	40.47%	-39.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.66%	30.29%	-28.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.62%	30.29%	-28.67%

JAAA vs. QIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAAA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QIS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

JAAA vs. QIS - Dividend Comparison

JAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than QIS's 2.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	4.93%	5.30%	6.35%	6.11%	2.74%	1.21%	0.26%
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF	2.14%	3.37%	1.07%	3.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JAAA and QIS in my portfolio?

JAAA and QIS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JAAA or QIS?

QIS has higher volatility (15.75%) compared to JAAA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAAA dropped -2.64% vs QIS's -62.82%.

Which ETF is better, JAAA or QIS?

On 3-year performance, JAAA leads with 6.18% vs -26.24% for QIS. On fees, JAAA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JAAA or QIS?

Over the 3-year period, JAAA has performed better with a 6.18% return vs -26.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JAAA or QIS?

JAAA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for QIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JAAA or QIS?

JAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 2.14% for QIS.

What is the main difference between JAAA and QIS?

JAAA is categorized as CLO, while QIS is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JAAA and 1.00% for QIS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.23 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.