IYM vs. RTM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RTM).
IYM and RTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IYM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index. It was launched on Jun 20, 2000. RTM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Materials -SEC. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. Both IYM and RTM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IYM or RTM.
Correlation
The correlation between IYM and RTM is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IYM vs. RTM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IYM:
-0.17
RTM:
0.04
IYM:
-0.13
RTM:
0.16
IYM:
0.98
RTM:
1.02
IYM:
-0.18
RTM:
0.01
IYM:
-0.59
RTM:
0.16
IYM:
4.17%
RTM:
3.59%
IYM:
14.64%
RTM:
15.20%
IYM:
-67.78%
RTM:
-84.51%
IYM:
-14.01%
RTM:
-55.56%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYM achieves a -3.58% return, which is significantly lower than RTM's -0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IYM has underperformed RTM with an annualized return of 6.58%, while RTM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.21% annualized return.
IYM
-3.58%
-8.41%
-6.42%
-3.62%
8.18%
6.58%
RTM
-0.36%
-7.30%
-4.44%
-0.54%
9.62%
8.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IYM vs. RTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than RTM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IYM vs. RTM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IYM vs. RTM - Dividend Comparison
IYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than RTM's 1.50% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF | 2.19% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 1.48% | 1.39% | 2.09% | 1.68% | 1.43% | 1.47% | 2.03% | 1.77% | 1.79% |
RTM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 1.50% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.45% | 1.36% |
Drawdowns
IYM vs. RTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYM drawdown since its inception was -67.78%, smaller than the maximum RTM drawdown of -84.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYM and RTM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IYM vs. RTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) is 4.34%, while Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RTM) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that IYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.