PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYLD vs. REET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYLD vs. REET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYLD achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than REET's 8.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IYLD having a 4.00% annualized return and REET not far behind at 3.99%.


IYLD

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.01%
YTD
4.95%
6M
5.45%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
10.59%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
4.00%

REET

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
8.07%
6M
7.69%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
9.19%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
3.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYLD vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYLD
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF
4.95%15.44%2.00%12.55%-16.80%3.37%-1.18%15.82%-4.77%10.90%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
8.07%7.97%2.65%10.28%-24.10%32.43%-10.48%24.42%-5.27%7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between IYLD and REET is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2014

0.65

The correlation between IYLD and REET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYLD vs. REET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYLD
REET

Financial Services

23.3%
0.2%

Real Estate

23.1%
99.8%

Industrials

12.2%

-

Technology

6.3%

-

Utilities

6.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%

-

Basic Materials

5.9%

-

Healthcare

5.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Communication Services

3.8%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Financial Services

IYLD
23.3%
REET
0.2%

Real Estate

IYLD
23.1%
REET
99.8%

Industrials

IYLD
12.2%
REET

-

Technology

IYLD
6.3%
REET

-

Utilities

IYLD
6.0%
REET

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYLD
5.9%
REET

-

Basic Materials

IYLD
5.9%
REET

-

Healthcare

IYLD
5.2%
REET

-

Consumer Defensive

IYLD
4.7%
REET

-

Communication Services

IYLD
3.8%
REET

-

Energy

IYLD
3.6%
REET

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYLD vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYLD
IYLD Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

REET
REET Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYLD vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYLDREETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

1.02

+1.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.65

1.44

+2.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.18

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

1.36

+1.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.80

4.89

+6.90

IYLD vs. REET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the REET Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYLD and REET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYLDREETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.02

+1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.13

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.21

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.25

+0.25

Drawdowns

IYLD vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYLD drawdown since its inception was -30.23%, smaller than the maximum REET drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYLD and REET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYLDREETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.23%

-44.59%

+14.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.63%

-9.04%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.20%

-18.02%

+12.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.57%

-32.11%

+9.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.23%

-44.59%

+14.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-2.83%

+2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-9.79%

+5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

2.51%

-1.32%

Volatility

IYLD vs. REET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) is 1.53%, while iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that IYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYLDREETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

3.79%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.72%

8.81%

-4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.73%

12.10%

-6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.86%

16.95%

-9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.58%

18.84%

-9.26%

IYLD vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYLD vs. REET - Dividend Comparison

IYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than REET's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYLD
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF
4.61%4.72%5.32%5.76%5.45%3.47%4.38%5.25%5.78%4.22%4.84%5.26%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
3.42%3.67%3.64%3.27%2.43%3.18%2.65%5.25%5.73%3.84%5.37%3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYLD and REET have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REET has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to IYLD (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYLD dropped -30.23% vs REET's -44.59%.

On 10-year performance, IYLD leads with 4.00% vs 3.99% for REET. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, IYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYLD has performed better with a 4.00% return vs 3.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IYLD.

IYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 3.42% for REET.

IYLD is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while REET is REIT. IYLD tracks Morningstar Multi-Asset High Income Index, while REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IYLD and 0.14% for REET.

IYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYLD and REET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer