PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYC vs. WM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYC vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -2.72% return, which is significantly lower than WM's 0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IYC has underperformed WM with an annualized return of 11.49%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.50% annualized return.


IYC

1D
-0.53%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
-2.72%
6M
-2.86%
1Y
3.35%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
11.49%

WM

1D
0.46%
1M
-2.44%
YTD
0.08%
6M
3.05%
1Y
-6.93%
3Y*
11.49%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
15.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYC vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
-2.72%7.85%27.54%34.03%-31.78%19.65%24.58%27.36%1.76%19.87%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
0.08%10.50%14.28%16.20%-4.49%43.82%5.46%30.45%5.32%24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IYC and WM is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2000

0.46

The correlation between IYC and WM shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYC vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

WM
WM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYC vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYCWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.95

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

-0.41

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.85

-0.92

+1.77

IYC vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYC Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYC and WM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYCWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

-0.37

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.59

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.80

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.36

+0.05

Drawdowns

IYC vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, smaller than the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and WM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYCWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.10%

-77.85%

+24.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-16.95%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-18.14%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.90%

-18.14%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-30.07%

-5.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.39%

-10.80%

+4.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.95%

-17.69%

+7.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

7.64%

-3.69%

Volatility

IYC vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is 3.97%, while Waste Management, Inc. (WM) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that IYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYCWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

5.76%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

13.56%

-3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

18.58%

-4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

18.53%

+2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.89%

19.49%

+0.40%

Dividends

IYC vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than WM's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.51%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.56%1.50%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYC and WM have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WM has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to IYC (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs WM's -77.85%.

IYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYC and WM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer