PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IYC vs. WM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IYC and WM is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

IYC vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US Consumer Services ETF (IYC) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
17.42%
-6.12%
IYC
WM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IYC:

2.03

WM:

0.90

Sortino Ratio

IYC:

2.72

WM:

1.28

Omega Ratio

IYC:

1.35

WM:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

IYC:

2.21

WM:

1.37

Martin Ratio

IYC:

10.53

WM:

3.23

Ulcer Index

IYC:

2.93%

WM:

5.05%

Daily Std Dev

IYC:

15.16%

WM:

18.06%

Max Drawdown

IYC:

-53.10%

WM:

-77.85%

Current Drawdown

IYC:

-4.27%

WM:

-8.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than WM's 3.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IYC has underperformed WM with an annualized return of 12.10%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.19% annualized return.


IYC

YTD

0.75%

1M

-4.26%

6M

17.42%

1Y

31.88%

5Y*

11.43%

10Y*

12.10%

WM

YTD

3.08%

1M

-1.72%

6M

-6.21%

1Y

16.71%

5Y*

13.62%

10Y*

17.19%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IYC vs. WM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IYC is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IYC is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IYC is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IYC is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IYC is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IYC is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

WM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WM is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WM is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WM is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WM is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WM is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WM is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IYC vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Consumer Services ETF (IYC) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IYC, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.030.93
The chart of Sortino ratio for IYC, currently valued at 2.72, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.721.31
The chart of Omega ratio for IYC, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.351.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for IYC, currently valued at 2.21, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.211.40
The chart of Martin ratio for IYC, currently valued at 10.53, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.533.29
IYC
WM

The current IYC Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYC and WM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.03
0.93
IYC
WM

Dividends

IYC vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than WM's 1.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IYC
iShares US Consumer Services ETF
0.46%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%0.78%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.44%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%2.92%

Drawdowns

IYC vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, smaller than the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and WM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-4.27%
-8.65%
IYC
WM

Volatility

IYC vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

iShares US Consumer Services ETF (IYC) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 3.48%. This indicates that IYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.58%
3.48%
IYC
WM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab