IXUS vs. CWI
IXUS (iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF) and CWI (SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IXUS tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA Investable Market Index while CWI tracks the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXUS returned 9.78%/yr vs 9.91%/yr for CWI. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IXUS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CWI.
Performance
IXUS vs. CWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IXUS having a 14.51% return and CWI slightly lower at 13.91%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IXUS having a 9.78% annualized return and CWI not far ahead at 9.91%.
IXUS
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 14.51%
- 6M
- 17.16%
- 1Y
- 32.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
CWI
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 13.91%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 32.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
IXUS vs. CWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | 14.51% | 32.40% | 5.19% | 15.83% | -16.47% | 8.86% | 10.80% | 21.71% | -14.41% | 28.12% |
CWI SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 13.91% | 32.75% | 6.27% | 15.74% | -15.39% | 8.81% | 9.83% | 21.92% | -13.83% | 26.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXUS and CWI is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012 | 0.98 |
The correlation between IXUS and CWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
IXUS vs. CWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXUS
CWI
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IXUS
CWI
Technology
IXUS
CWI
Industrials
IXUS
CWI
Consumer Cyclical
IXUS
CWI
Basic Materials
IXUS
CWI
Healthcare
IXUS
CWI
Energy
IXUS
CWI
Consumer Defensive
IXUS
CWI
Communication Services
IXUS
CWI
Utilities
IXUS
CWI
Real Estate
IXUS
CWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXUS vs. CWI — Risk / Return Rank
IXUS
CWI
IXUS vs. CWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IXUS | CWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.38 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 2.81 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.13 | 10.92 | +0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IXUS | CWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.10 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.54 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.58 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.25 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
IXUS vs. CWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXUS drawdown since its inception was -36.22%, smaller than the maximum CWI drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXUS and CWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXUS | CWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.22% | -60.77% | +24.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.36% | -11.47% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.75% | -13.85% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.04% | -29.45% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.22% | -34.64% | -1.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -1.22% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | -12.86% | +5.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.95% | -0.05% |
Volatility
IXUS vs. CWI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) have volatilities of 5.64% and 5.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXUS | CWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 5.81% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.16% | 13.10% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.37% | 15.35% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 16.25% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 17.13% | -0.06% |
IXUS vs. CWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CWI's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXUS vs. CWI - Dividend Comparison
IXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than CWI's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWI SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 2.70% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 2.80% | 3.17% | 2.65% | 2.07% | 3.05% | 2.81% | 2.29% | 2.45% | 2.62% |
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | 2.83% | 3.24% | 3.33% | 3.13% | 2.48% | 3.12% | 1.85% | 3.09% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 2.58% | 2.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, IXUS and CWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CWI has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to IXUS (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXUS dropped -36.22% vs CWI's -60.77%.
On 10-year performance, CWI leads with 9.91% vs 9.78% for IXUS. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IXUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CWI has performed better with a 9.91% return vs 9.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CWI.
IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.70% for CWI.
IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA Investable Market Index, while CWI tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IXUS and 0.30% for CWI.
IXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXUS and CWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer