PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXUS vs. CWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXUS vs. CWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IXUS having a 14.51% return and CWI slightly lower at 13.91%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IXUS having a 9.78% annualized return and CWI not far ahead at 9.91%.


IXUS

1D
-1.01%
1M
4.91%
YTD
14.51%
6M
17.16%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
9.78%

CWI

1D
-1.22%
1M
5.25%
YTD
13.91%
6M
16.33%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXUS vs. CWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
14.51%32.40%5.19%15.83%-16.47%8.86%10.80%21.71%-14.41%28.12%
CWI
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
13.91%32.75%6.27%15.74%-15.39%8.81%9.83%21.92%-13.83%26.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IXUS and CWI is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.98

The correlation between IXUS and CWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

IXUS vs. CWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXUS
CWI

Financial Services

22.4%
17.4%

Technology

18.0%
14.9%

Industrials

15.9%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
5.8%

Basic Materials

7.6%
4.4%

Healthcare

7.1%
5.3%

Energy

5.2%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
2.8%

Communication Services

4.8%
3.2%

Utilities

3.2%
1.2%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.9%

Financial Services

IXUS
22.4%
CWI
17.4%

Technology

IXUS
18.0%
CWI
14.9%

Industrials

IXUS
15.9%
CWI
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IXUS
8.3%
CWI
5.8%

Basic Materials

IXUS
7.6%
CWI
4.4%

Healthcare

IXUS
7.1%
CWI
5.3%

Energy

IXUS
5.2%
CWI
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

IXUS
5.1%
CWI
2.8%

Communication Services

IXUS
4.8%
CWI
3.2%

Utilities

IXUS
3.2%
CWI
1.2%

Real Estate

IXUS
2.5%
CWI
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXUS vs. CWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXUS
IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CWI
CWI Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXUS vs. CWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXUSCWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.38

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

2.81

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

10.92

+0.21

IXUS vs. CWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the CWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXUS and CWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXUSCWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.10

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.54

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.58

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.25

+0.24

Drawdowns

IXUS vs. CWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXUS drawdown since its inception was -36.22%, smaller than the maximum CWI drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXUS and CWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXUSCWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.22%

-60.77%

+24.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-11.47%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-13.85%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.04%

-29.45%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.22%

-34.64%

-1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-1.22%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-12.86%

+5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.95%

-0.05%

Volatility

IXUS vs. CWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) have volatilities of 5.64% and 5.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXUSCWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

5.81%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

13.10%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

15.35%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

16.25%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

17.13%

-0.06%

IXUS vs. CWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CWI's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXUS vs. CWI - Dividend Comparison

IXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than CWI's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWI
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
2.70%2.97%2.89%2.80%3.17%2.65%2.07%3.05%2.81%2.29%2.45%2.62%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
2.83%3.24%3.33%3.13%2.48%3.12%1.85%3.09%3.00%2.41%2.58%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, IXUS and CWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CWI has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to IXUS (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXUS dropped -36.22% vs CWI's -60.77%.

On 10-year performance, CWI leads with 9.91% vs 9.78% for IXUS. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IXUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CWI has performed better with a 9.91% return vs 9.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CWI.

IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.70% for CWI.

IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA Investable Market Index, while CWI tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IXUS and 0.30% for CWI.

IXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXUS and CWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer