PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXJ vs. EPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXJ vs. EPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) and WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXJ achieves a -5.26% return, which is significantly higher than EPI's -10.02% return. Over the past 10 years, IXJ has underperformed EPI with an annualized return of 7.66%, while EPI has yielded a comparatively higher 8.98% annualized return.


IXJ

1D
0.39%
1M
0.34%
YTD
-5.26%
6M
-4.88%
1Y
9.30%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
7.66%

EPI

1D
-1.40%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
-10.02%
6M
-8.12%
1Y
-9.55%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXJ vs. EPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
-5.26%14.99%0.55%3.62%-4.94%19.60%12.74%23.23%2.83%20.44%
EPI
WisdomTree India Earnings Fund
-10.02%2.25%10.70%26.03%-4.74%26.41%18.55%1.53%-9.88%39.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IXJ and EPI is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2008

0.49

The correlation between IXJ and EPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXJ vs. EPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXJ
EPI

Healthcare

98.9%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

13.5%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.5%

Energy

-

17.3%

Financial Services

-

23.4%

Industrials

-

9.7%

Real Estate

-

0.9%

Technology

-

8.3%

Utilities

-

8.4%

Healthcare

IXJ
98.9%
EPI
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

IXJ
0.5%
EPI
3.5%

Basic Materials

IXJ

-

EPI
13.5%

Communication Services

IXJ

-

EPI
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IXJ

-

EPI
7.5%

Energy

IXJ

-

EPI
17.3%

Financial Services

IXJ

-

EPI
23.4%

Industrials

IXJ

-

EPI
9.7%

Real Estate

IXJ

-

EPI
0.9%

Technology

IXJ

-

EPI
8.3%

Utilities

IXJ

-

EPI
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXJ vs. EPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXJ
IXJ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

EPI
EPI Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXJ vs. EPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) and WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXJEPIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

-0.64

+1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.06

-0.84

+1.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.90

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

-0.57

+1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.11

-1.39

+3.50

IXJ vs. EPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the EPI Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXJ and EPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXJEPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

-0.64

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.33

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.44

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.13

+0.28

Drawdowns

IXJ vs. EPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXJ drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum EPI drawdown of -66.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXJ and EPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXJEPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.60%

-66.21%

+25.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.78%

-16.88%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.14%

-21.89%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

-21.89%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.35%

-50.29%

+22.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.27%

-17.83%

+8.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-18.65%

+11.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

6.87%

-2.46%

Volatility

IXJ vs. EPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) is 3.75%, while WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that IXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXJEPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

4.86%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

12.80%

-2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

14.94%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

16.21%

-2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

20.35%

-4.68%

IXJ vs. EPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXJ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than EPI's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXJ vs. EPI - Dividend Comparison

IXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while EPI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPI
WisdomTree India Earnings Fund
0.00%0.00%0.27%0.15%6.01%1.18%0.78%1.17%1.18%0.85%1.05%1.20%
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
1.47%1.40%1.50%1.38%1.17%1.12%1.27%1.42%2.11%1.46%1.73%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXJ and EPI have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPI has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to IXJ (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXJ dropped -40.60% vs EPI's -66.21%.

On 10-year performance, EPI leads with 8.98% vs 7.66% for IXJ. On fees, IXJ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPI has performed better with a 8.98% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXJ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPI.

IXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for EPI.

IXJ is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while EPI is Asia Pacific Equities. IXJ tracks S&P Global Healthcare Sector Index, while EPI tracks WisdomTree India Earnings Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXJ and 0.84% for EPI.

IXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXJ and EPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer