PortfoliosLab logo
IXG vs. VPL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IXG and VPL is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

IXG vs. VPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IXG:

1.60

VPL:

0.61

Sortino Ratio

IXG:

1.99

VPL:

0.84

Omega Ratio

IXG:

1.31

VPL:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

IXG:

2.03

VPL:

0.59

Martin Ratio

IXG:

9.63

VPL:

1.76

Ulcer Index

IXG:

2.86%

VPL:

5.51%

Daily Std Dev

IXG:

18.68%

VPL:

19.19%

Max Drawdown

IXG:

-78.42%

VPL:

-55.49%

Current Drawdown

IXG:

-0.60%

VPL:

-0.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXG achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly higher than VPL's 11.67% return. Over the past 10 years, IXG has outperformed VPL with an annualized return of 9.17%, while VPL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.16% annualized return.


IXG

YTD

12.98%

1M

4.85%

6M

8.57%

1Y

29.63%

3Y*

16.63%

5Y*

19.28%

10Y*

9.17%

VPL

YTD

11.67%

1M

4.21%

6M

8.98%

1Y

11.52%

3Y*

7.28%

5Y*

7.99%

10Y*

5.16%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Global Financials ETF

Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF

IXG vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IXG vs. VPL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IXG is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IXG is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IXG is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IXG is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IXG is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IXG is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VPL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VPL is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VPL is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VPL is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VPL is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VPL is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VPL is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IXG vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the VPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXG and VPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

IXG vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison

IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than VPL's 3.00% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IXG
iShares Global Financials ETF
2.33%2.64%2.62%3.71%1.68%2.13%2.87%3.14%2.12%2.21%2.79%2.38%
VPL
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
3.00%3.15%3.12%2.75%3.19%1.81%2.85%3.06%2.57%2.65%2.43%2.69%

Drawdowns

IXG vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXG drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, which is greater than VPL's maximum drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXG and VPL.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

IXG vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) is 3.19%, while Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that IXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...