PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IXC vs. FILL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IXC vs. FILL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.12%
-2.32%
IXC
FILL

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly higher than FILL's 8.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IXC having a 4.52% annualized return and FILL not far behind at 4.37%.


IXC

YTD

12.34%

1M

4.57%

6M

3.12%

1Y

12.86%

5Y (annualized)

11.88%

10Y (annualized)

4.52%

FILL

YTD

8.36%

1M

3.00%

6M

-2.31%

1Y

8.96%

5Y (annualized)

10.88%

10Y (annualized)

4.37%

Key characteristics


IXCFILL
Sharpe Ratio0.800.56
Sortino Ratio1.160.84
Omega Ratio1.141.10
Calmar Ratio1.160.67
Martin Ratio2.711.56
Ulcer Index4.74%5.76%
Daily Std Dev16.01%16.06%
Max Drawdown-67.88%-65.98%
Current Drawdown-1.84%-6.22%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IXC vs. FILL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXC has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FILL's 0.39% expense ratio.


IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
Expense ratio chart for IXC: current value at 0.46% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.46%
Expense ratio chart for FILL: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between IXC and FILL is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IXC vs. FILL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IXC, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.800.56
The chart of Sortino ratio for IXC, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.160.84
The chart of Omega ratio for IXC, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.141.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for IXC, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.160.67
The chart of Martin ratio for IXC, currently valued at 2.71, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.711.56
IXC
FILL

The current IXC Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the FILL Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXC and FILL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.80
0.56
IXC
FILL

Dividends

IXC vs. FILL - Dividend Comparison

IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than FILL's 3.94% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
3.57%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%3.02%2.48%
FILL
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
3.94%4.16%4.82%3.93%3.97%5.71%3.17%3.10%2.75%3.41%2.43%2.46%

Drawdowns

IXC vs. FILL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, roughly equal to the maximum FILL drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and FILL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.84%
-6.22%
IXC
FILL

Volatility

IXC vs. FILL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) have volatilities of 3.91% and 3.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.91%
3.74%
IXC
FILL