IXC vs. FILL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL).
IXC and FILL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IXC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Energy Sector Index. It was launched on Nov 16, 2001. FILL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Energy Producers Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. Both IXC and FILL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IXC or FILL.
Key characteristics
| IXC | FILL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.39% | 5.58% |
| 1Y Return | 12.57% | 8.76% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 17.27% | 14.29% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.96% | 9.92% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.19% | 4.11% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.79 | 0.53 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.15 | 0.81 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.14 | 1.10 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.15 | 0.65 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.72 | 1.56 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.69% | 5.54% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.19% | 16.21% |
| Max Drawdown | -67.88% | -65.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.42% | -8.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXC and FILL is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IXC vs. FILL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly higher than FILL's 5.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IXC having a 4.19% annualized return and FILL not far behind at 4.11%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IXC vs. FILL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXC has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FILL's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IXC vs. FILL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IXC vs. FILL - Dividend Comparison
IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than FILL's 4.04% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 3.66% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% | 3.02% | 2.48% |
FILL iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF | 4.04% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.93% | 3.97% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.10% | 2.75% | 3.41% | 2.43% | 2.46% |
Drawdowns
IXC vs. FILL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, roughly equal to the maximum FILL drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and FILL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IXC vs. FILL - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) have volatilities of 4.74% and 4.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.