PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWY vs. VONV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWY vs. VONV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWY achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than VONV's 14.28% return. Over the past 10 years, IWY has outperformed VONV with an annualized return of 19.57%, while VONV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.35% annualized return.


IWY

1D
-1.41%
1M
5.83%
YTD
7.20%
6M
6.65%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
25.47%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
19.57%

VONV

1D
0.00%
1M
4.28%
YTD
14.28%
6M
14.88%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWY vs. VONV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
7.20%18.19%34.89%46.49%-29.91%31.05%39.01%36.20%-0.72%31.69%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
14.28%15.81%14.28%11.40%-7.65%25.28%2.71%26.48%-8.45%13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between IWY and VONV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between IWY and VONV has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IWY vs. VONV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWY
VONV

Technology

54.9%
14.9%

Communication Services

13.9%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
7.3%

Healthcare

6.6%
10.9%

Financial Services

5.6%
18.9%

Industrials

4.0%
13.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
7.2%

Utilities

1.1%
4.4%

Real Estate

0.3%
4.1%

Basic Materials

0.3%
3.8%

Energy

0.0%
7.0%

Technology

IWY
54.9%
VONV
14.9%

Communication Services

IWY
13.9%
VONV
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IWY
11.4%
VONV
7.3%

Healthcare

IWY
6.6%
VONV
10.9%

Financial Services

IWY
5.6%
VONV
18.9%

Industrials

IWY
4.0%
VONV
13.1%

Consumer Defensive

IWY
3.0%
VONV
7.2%

Utilities

IWY
1.1%
VONV
4.4%

Real Estate

IWY
0.3%
VONV
4.1%

Basic Materials

IWY
0.3%
VONV
3.8%

Energy

IWY
0.0%
VONV
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWY vs. VONV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWY
IWY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWY vs. VONV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWYVONVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.48

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

4.18

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

17.54

-12.28

IWY vs. VONV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWY Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the VONV Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWY and VONV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWYVONVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.64

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.70

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.66

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.71

+0.21

Drawdowns

IWY vs. VONV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWY drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, smaller than the maximum VONV drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWY and VONV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWYVONVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.68%

-38.21%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.63%

-6.81%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-15.70%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.68%

-18.87%

-13.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

-38.21%

+5.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

0.00%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-3.91%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

1.62%

+3.47%

Volatility

IWY vs. VONV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) at 2.94%. This indicates that IWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWYVONVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

2.94%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

8.09%

+3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

10.81%

+4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

14.77%

+6.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

17.24%

+3.73%

IWY vs. VONV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VONV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWY vs. VONV - Dividend Comparison

IWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VONV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.33%0.36%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.63%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWY and VONV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWY has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to VONV (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWY dropped -32.68% vs VONV's -38.21%.

On 10-year performance, IWY leads with 19.57% vs 11.35% for VONV. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONV has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWY.

VONV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.33% for IWY.

IWY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VONV is Large Cap Value Equities. IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWY and 0.06% for VONV.

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWY and VONV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer