PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWY vs. HYGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWY vs. HYGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored Bond Index Fund (HYGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWY achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly higher than HYGV's 2.60% return.


IWY

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.64%
6M
9.38%
YTD
4.76%
1Y
14.76%
3Y*
22.64%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
18.79%
ALL TIME*
17.00%

HYGV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.32%
6M
1.96%
YTD
2.60%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
8.17%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.07M$3.90M$4.17M
$105.51M$107.89M$113.92M

IWY vs. HYGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
4.76%18.19%34.89%46.49%-29.91%31.05%39.01%36.20%-11.62%
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored Bond Index Fund
2.60%7.92%8.02%12.11%-12.60%5.93%8.01%15.76%-4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between IWY and HYGV is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.66

The correlation between IWY and HYGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWY vs. HYGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IWY
IWY Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGV
HYGV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HYGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWY vs. HYGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored Bond Index Fund (HYGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWYHYGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.29

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

2.17

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

9.34

-6.76

IWY vs. HYGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWY Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the HYGV Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWY and HYGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWY vs. HYGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWY drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, which is greater than HYGV's maximum drawdown of -23.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWY and HYGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWYHYGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.68%

-23.47%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.63%

-2.68%

-13.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-5.56%

-17.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.68%

-17.12%

-15.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.06%

0.00%

-4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-3.25%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

0.62%

+5.11%

Volatility

IWY vs. HYGV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored Bond Index Fund (HYGV) at 0.87%. This indicates that IWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWYHYGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.41%

0.87%

+6.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.54%

3.17%

+11.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

3.87%

+14.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.87%

7.59%

+14.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.16%

9.11%

+12.05%

IWY vs. HYGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGV's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWY vs. HYGV - Dividend Comparison

IWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than HYGV's 7.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored Bond Index Fund
7.41%7.48%8.20%8.77%7.64%6.07%6.18%7.95%5.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.35%0.36%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWY and HYGV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWY has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to HYGV (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWY dropped -32.68% vs HYGV's -23.47%.

On 5-year performance, IWY leads with 13.56% vs 3.55% for HYGV. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HYGV has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IWY has performed better with a 13.56% return vs 3.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for HYGV.

HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.35% for IWY.

IWY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HYGV is High Yield Bonds. IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWY and 0.37% for HYGV.

HYGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWY and HYGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer