PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWS vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 15.10% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IWS has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.24%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


IWS

1D
0.94%
1M
3.50%
YTD
15.10%
6M
16.20%
1Y
28.24%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
10.24%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
15.10%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IWS and VOO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.88

The correlation between IWS and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWS vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWS
VOO

Industrials

16.7%
8.3%

Technology

16.5%
35.7%

Financial Services

14.1%
11.6%

Real Estate

8.6%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
10.2%

Energy

8.1%
3.5%

Healthcare

7.3%
8.5%

Utilities

7.0%
2.4%

Basic Materials

5.4%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.9%

Communication Services

3.1%
11.3%

Industrials

IWS
16.7%
VOO
8.3%

Technology

IWS
16.5%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

IWS
14.1%
VOO
11.6%

Real Estate

IWS
8.6%
VOO
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IWS
8.4%
VOO
10.2%

Energy

IWS
8.1%
VOO
3.5%

Healthcare

IWS
7.3%
VOO
8.5%

Utilities

IWS
7.0%
VOO
2.4%

Basic Materials

IWS
5.4%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

IWS
4.8%
VOO
4.9%

Communication Services

IWS
3.1%
VOO
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWSVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

2.53

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.06

3.43

-0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.46

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

3.42

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.20

15.95

-1.75

IWS vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWS Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWS and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWSVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.53

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.85

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.87

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.89

-0.47

Drawdowns

IWS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWSVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-33.99%

-28.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-8.90%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-18.69%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

-24.52%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

-33.99%

-9.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-3.69%

-4.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.91%

+0.08%

Volatility

IWS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that IWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWSVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

2.74%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

8.88%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

11.78%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

16.81%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.36%

18.01%

+1.35%

IWS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.34%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWS and VOO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWS has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs 10.24% for IWS. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.

IWS has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWS and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer