PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWS vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 15.78% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IWS has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.56%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


IWS

1D
-1.08%
1M
2.64%
YTD
15.78%
6M
14.47%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
10.56%

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
15.78%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.19%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IWS and VOO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.88

The correlation between IWS and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWS vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWS
VOO

Technology

18.7%
39.1%

Industrials

16.2%
7.6%

Financial Services

13.7%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
9.8%

Real Estate

8.3%
1.8%

Healthcare

7.6%
8.3%

Energy

7.4%
3.2%

Utilities

6.6%
2.5%

Basic Materials

5.3%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.5%

Communication Services

3.1%
10.5%

Technology

IWS
18.7%
VOO
39.1%

Industrials

IWS
16.2%
VOO
7.6%

Financial Services

IWS
13.7%
VOO
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IWS
8.5%
VOO
9.8%

Real Estate

IWS
8.3%
VOO
1.8%

Healthcare

IWS
7.6%
VOO
8.3%

Energy

IWS
7.4%
VOO
3.2%

Utilities

IWS
6.6%
VOO
2.5%

Basic Materials

IWS
5.3%
VOO
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

IWS
4.7%
VOO
4.5%

Communication Services

IWS
3.1%
VOO
10.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWSVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

2.67

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.39

11.96

+1.43

IWS vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWS and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWSVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-33.99%

-28.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-8.90%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-18.69%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

-24.52%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

-33.99%

-9.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-3.14%

+1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

-3.68%

-4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.99%

+0.01%

Volatility

IWS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is 4.37%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that IWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWSVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

4.83%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

9.82%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

12.46%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

16.91%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

18.02%

+1.33%

IWS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.34%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWS and VOO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to IWS (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.61% vs 10.56% for IWS. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.

IWS has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.03% for VOO.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWS and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer