IWP vs. SCHM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM).
IWP and SCHM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap Growth Index. It was launched on Jul 17, 2001. SCHM is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. It was launched on Jan 13, 2011. Both IWP and SCHM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWP or SCHM.
Correlation
The correlation between IWP and SCHM is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWP vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWP:
1.88
SCHM:
1.42
IWP:
2.53
SCHM:
1.97
IWP:
1.32
SCHM:
1.25
IWP:
2.00
SCHM:
2.59
IWP:
8.67
SCHM:
6.30
IWP:
3.50%
SCHM:
3.36%
IWP:
16.12%
SCHM:
14.91%
IWP:
-56.92%
SCHM:
-42.43%
IWP:
-4.41%
SCHM:
-3.80%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWP achieves a 4.38% return, which is significantly higher than SCHM's 4.01% return. Over the past 10 years, IWP has outperformed SCHM with an annualized return of 12.07%, while SCHM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.26% annualized return.
IWP
4.38%
3.87%
19.30%
28.87%
11.34%
12.07%
SCHM
4.01%
4.34%
9.40%
20.30%
10.45%
11.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWP vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWP has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWP vs. SCHM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IWP
SCHM
IWP vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWP vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison
IWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than SCHM's 1.97% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWP iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.60% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 1.47% | 0.98% | 1.03% |
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.97% | 2.05% | 3.03% | 3.62% | 2.52% | 2.68% | 2.51% | 4.13% | 2.28% | 2.12% | 3.19% | 2.24% |
Drawdowns
IWP vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWP drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, which is greater than SCHM's maximum drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWP and SCHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWP vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) at 5.27%. This indicates that IWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.