IWP vs. ILCG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG).
IWP and ILCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap Growth Index. It was launched on Jul 17, 2001. ILCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. Both IWP and ILCG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWP or ILCG.
Key characteristics
| IWP | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.97% | 7.07% |
| 1Y Return | 23.45% | 34.81% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.26% | 5.94% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.56% | 14.39% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.89% | 14.70% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.35 | 2.15 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.09% | 15.09% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.92% | -52.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.63% | -4.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWP and ILCG is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWP vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IWP achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 7.07% return. Over the past 10 years, IWP has underperformed ILCG with an annualized return of 10.89%, while ILCG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.70% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWP vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWP has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWP vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWP vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison
IWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than ILCG's 0.62% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWP iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF | 0.49% | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 1.16% | 0.98% | 1.03% | 0.80% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.62% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.87% | 0.94% |
Drawdowns
IWP vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWP drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, which is greater than ILCG's maximum drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWP and ILCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWP vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Midcap Growth ETF (IWP) is 4.36%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that IWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.