PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMY vs. XDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWMY vs. XDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 15.27% return, which is significantly higher than XDTE's 10.21% return.


IWMY

1D
1.69%
1M
-0.31%
6M
10.17%
YTD
15.27%
1Y
21.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.16%

XDTE

1D
1.00%
1M
1.83%
6M
7.46%
YTD
10.21%
1Y
21.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$647.71K$735.48K$1.03M
$6.67M$7.77M$7.49M

IWMY vs. XDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF
15.27%10.18%5.71%
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
10.21%12.60%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMY and XDTE is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.74

The correlation between IWMY and XDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWMY vs. XDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XDTE
XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWMY vs. XDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWMYXDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.79

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.07

11.85

-5.78

IWMY vs. XDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the XDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMY and XDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWMY vs. XDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, roughly equal to the maximum XDTE drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and XDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMYXDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-19.09%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-7.68%

-3.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

0.00%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-2.25%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

1.81%

+1.75%

Volatility

IWMY vs. XDTE - Volatility Comparison

Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) at 3.61%. This indicates that IWMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMYXDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

3.61%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

9.34%

+4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.34%

11.90%

+4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

13.86%

+1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.80%

13.86%

+1.94%

IWMY vs. XDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMY has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than XDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWMY vs. XDTE - Dividend Comparison

IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.16%, more than XDTE's 31.73% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF
41.16%63.33%107.92%11.34%
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
31.73%39.16%20.35%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWMY and XDTE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWMY has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to XDTE (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs XDTE's -19.09%.

On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 21.52% vs 21.36% for XDTE. On fees, XDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, XDTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 21.52% return vs 21.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for IWMY.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 41.16%, compared with 31.73% for XDTE.

IWMY is categorized as Options Trading, while XDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for IWMY and 0.97% for XDTE.

XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWMY and XDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer