PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMW vs. MSTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWMW vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMW achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -34.39% return.


IWMW

1D
0.23%
1M
4.49%
YTD
12.03%
6M
10.74%
1Y
24.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTY

1D
-9.12%
1M
-37.97%
YTD
-34.39%
6M
-36.51%
1Y
-70.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMW vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IWMW
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF
12.03%7.82%5.85%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-34.39%-42.71%60.85%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMW and MSTY is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWMW vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMW
IWMW Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IWMW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMW Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMW Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMW vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWMWMSTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.76

+0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

-0.95

+4.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.46

-1.42

+13.88

IWMW vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMW Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMW and MSTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWMW vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMW drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -74.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMW and MSTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMWMSTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.82%

-74.21%

+52.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-74.21%

+67.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-74.21%

+74.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-27.06%

+23.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

49.58%

-47.57%

Volatility

IWMW vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) is 3.39%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 20.77%. This indicates that IWMW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMWMSTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

20.77%

-17.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

50.35%

-41.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48%

62.64%

-50.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

72.01%

-55.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

72.01%

-55.96%

IWMW vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWMW vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

IWMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.69%, less than MSTY's 314.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IWMW
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF
21.69%20.98%17.73%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
314.78%294.61%104.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWMW and MSTY have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTY has higher volatility (20.77%) compared to IWMW (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMW dropped -21.82% vs MSTY's -74.21%.

On 1-year performance, IWMW leads with 24.97% vs -70.33% for MSTY. On fees, IWMW is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IWMW has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IWMW has performed better with a 24.97% return vs -70.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWMW is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTY.

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 314.78%, compared with 21.69% for IWMW.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IWMW and 0.99% for MSTY.

IWMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWMW and MSTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer