IWML vs. SPYG
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG).
IWML and SPYG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWML is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2021. SPYG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2000. Both IWML and SPYG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IWML vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWML vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWML ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN | 0.97% | 9.64% | 15.70% | 22.31% | -41.80% | 2.08% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | -6.91% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 26.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWML achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's -6.91% return.
IWML
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -10.49%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 37.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- -1.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- -6.91%
- 6M
- -5.21%
- 1Y
- 23.24%
- 3Y*
- 22.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWML vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWML has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IWML vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
IWML
SPYG
IWML vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWML | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 1.04 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 1.62 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.75 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.52 | 6.81 | -2.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWML | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.04 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.60 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.32 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between IWML and SPYG is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IWML vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
IWML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWML ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.57% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Drawdowns
IWML vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWML drawdown since its inception was -60.06%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWML and SPYG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWML | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.06% | -67.63% | +7.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.86% | -13.76% | -17.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.06% | -32.67% | -27.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.20% | -9.06% | -13.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.77% | -24.48% | -8.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.58% | 3.55% | +5.03% |
Volatility
IWML vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Factor TR ETN (IWML) has a higher volatility of 16.29% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 7.32%. This indicates that IWML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWML | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.29% | 7.32% | +8.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.01% | 12.90% | +17.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.43% | 22.42% | +27.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.20% | 21.13% | +25.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.53% | 20.57% | +25.96% |