PortfoliosLab logo
IWM vs. IWB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IWM and IWB is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

IWM vs. IWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

450.00%500.00%550.00%600.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
497.84%
550.97%
IWM
IWB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IWM:

-0.05

IWB:

0.56

Sortino Ratio

IWM:

0.11

IWB:

0.91

Omega Ratio

IWM:

1.01

IWB:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

IWM:

-0.04

IWB:

0.57

Martin Ratio

IWM:

-0.12

IWB:

2.21

Ulcer Index

IWM:

9.27%

IWB:

4.95%

Daily Std Dev

IWM:

23.98%

IWB:

19.38%

Max Drawdown

IWM:

-59.05%

IWB:

-55.38%

Current Drawdown

IWM:

-18.13%

IWB:

-8.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWM achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly lower than IWB's -4.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IWM has underperformed IWB with an annualized return of 6.29%, while IWB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.87% annualized return.


IWM

YTD

-10.45%

1M

9.95%

6M

-16.34%

1Y

-2.58%

5Y*

9.73%

10Y*

6.29%

IWB

YTD

-4.06%

1M

11.36%

6M

-4.60%

1Y

9.71%

5Y*

15.38%

10Y*

11.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWM vs. IWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IWB's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IWM vs. IWB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWM is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWM is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWM is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWM is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWM is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWM is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

IWB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWB is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWB is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWB is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWB is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWB is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWB is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IWM vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IWM Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the IWB Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWM and IWB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.11
0.50
IWM
IWB

Dividends

IWM vs. IWB - Dividend Comparison

IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than IWB's 1.18% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
1.25%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%1.26%
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
1.18%1.14%1.31%1.56%1.09%1.37%1.71%2.06%1.64%1.89%1.95%1.71%

Drawdowns

IWM vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWM drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than IWB's maximum drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWM and IWB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-18.13%
-8.43%
IWM
IWB

Volatility

IWM vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) have volatilities of 11.12% and 11.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.12%
11.33%
IWM
IWB