IWL vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
IWL and VONG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 200 Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2009. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. Both IWL and VONG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWL or VONG.
Correlation
The correlation between IWL and VONG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWL vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWL:
2.36
VONG:
2.13
IWL:
3.10
VONG:
2.75
IWL:
1.44
VONG:
1.39
IWL:
3.44
VONG:
2.79
IWL:
15.47
VONG:
10.90
IWL:
2.01%
VONG:
3.35%
IWL:
13.16%
VONG:
17.19%
IWL:
-32.71%
VONG:
-32.72%
IWL:
-0.55%
VONG:
-1.83%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWL achieves a 30.67% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 36.31% return. Over the past 10 years, IWL has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 14.03%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.80% annualized return.
IWL
30.67%
2.25%
11.50%
31.09%
16.19%
14.03%
VONG
36.31%
4.35%
14.34%
36.49%
19.55%
16.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWL vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWL vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWL vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than VONG's 0.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 1.01% | 1.30% | 1.53% | 1.12% | 1.30% | 1.96% | 1.93% | 1.69% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.68% | 1.82% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
IWL vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, roughly equal to the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWL vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) is 4.11%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that IWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.