IWFL vs. JLGMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

IWFL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN) and JLGMX (JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6) are both funds - IWFL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth (200%), while JLGMX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan. IWFL is passively managed, while JLGMX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWFL returned 12.16%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for JLGMX. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IWFL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for JLGMX.

Performance

IWFL vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFL achieves a -3.79% return, which is significantly lower than JLGMX's -1.77% return.

IWFL

• 1D: 2.19%
• 1M: -4.76%
• 6M: -0.09%
• YTD: -3.79%
• 1Y: 12.27%
• 3Y*: 26.94%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.51%

JLGMX

• 1D: 3.89%
• 1M: -4.42%
• 6M: -0.57%
• YTD: -1.77%
• 1Y: 4.85%
• 3Y*: 17.12%
• 5Y*: 10.10%
• 10Y*: 18.67%
• ALL TIME*: 16.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IWFL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN	$7.49K	$14.18K	$17.14K
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

IWFL vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IWFL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN	-3.79%	18.54%	61.94%	84.47%	-55.71%	46.03%
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6	-1.77%	14.38%	35.40%	34.95%	-25.20%	12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFL and JLGMX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021	0.95

The correlation between IWFL and JLGMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IWFL vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IWFL

IWFL Risk / Return Rank: 16
IWFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
IWFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
IWFL Omega Ratio Rank: 17
IWFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
IWFL Martin Ratio Rank: 16

JLGMX

JLGMX Risk / Return Rank: 8
JLGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
JLGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
JLGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
JLGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
JLGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWFL vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWFL	JLGMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	0.18	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.57	0.38	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.05	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	0.20	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.73	0.54	+0.19

IWFL vs. JLGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFL Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is comparable to the JLGMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFL and JLGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWFL vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFL drawdown since its inception was -59.29%, which is greater than JLGMX's maximum drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFL and JLGMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWFL	JLGMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.29%	-31.82%	-27.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.80%	-16.73%	-16.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.84%	-21.47%	-25.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.29%	-31.13%	-28.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.19%	-9.01%	-6.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.68%	-5.80%	-13.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.34%	6.21%	+5.13%

Volatility

IWFL vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN (IWFL) has a higher volatility of 13.36% compared to JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) at 8.32%. This indicates that IWFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JLGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWFL	JLGMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.36%	8.32%	+5.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.04%	15.28%	+14.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.73%	18.99%	+17.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.31%	20.74%	+26.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.34%	21.80%	+24.54%

IWFL vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWFL vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison

IWFL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JLGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWFL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6	11.24%	11.04%	2.12%	0.31%	3.49%	14.25%	5.14%	12.65%	15.59%	14.44%	9.71%	4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWFL and JLGMX in my portfolio?

IWFL and JLGMX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWFL or JLGMX?

IWFL has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to JLGMX (8.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWFL dropped -59.29% vs JLGMX's -31.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.