IWDP.AS vs. MAGS
IWDP.AS (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWDP.AS is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. IWDP.AS is passively managed, while MAGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IWDP.AS returned 7.47%/yr vs 30.11%/yr for MAGS. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWDP.AS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
IWDP.AS vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IWDP.AS is traded in EUR, while MAGS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MAGS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWDP.AS achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's 5.99% return.
IWDP.AS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 1Y
- 16.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
MAGS
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 24.14%
- 3Y*
- 30.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWDP.AS vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDP.AS iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 12.81% | -3.33% | 6.79% | 8.08% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 5.99% | 8.39% | 74.79% | 34.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWDP.AS and MAGS is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWDP.AS vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
IWDP.AS
MAGS
IWDP.AS vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWDP.AS) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWDP.AS | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.20 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 1.35 | +0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.69 | 3.93 | +2.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWDP.AS vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWDP.AS drawdown since its inception was -74.82%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -35.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDP.AS and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWDP.AS | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.82% | -35.73% | -39.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -17.97% | +10.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.92% | -35.73% | +15.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.82% | -2.16% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.14% | -6.00% | -15.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 6.15% | -3.75% |
Volatility
IWDP.AS vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWDP.AS) is 3.26%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that IWDP.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWDP.AS | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 7.34% | -4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 15.66% | -7.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.10% | 21.18% | -10.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 26.63% | -12.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 26.63% | -10.64% |
IWDP.AS vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWDP.AS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWDP.AS vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
IWDP.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than MAGS's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDP.AS iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.88% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 3.15% | 3.70% | 2.11% | 3.18% | 2.91% | 3.87% | 3.11% | 3.06% | 2.96% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.43% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWDP.AS and MAGS have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IWDP.AS.
IWDP.AS is categorized as REIT, while MAGS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IWDP.AS and 0.29% for MAGS.
Find the right allocation for IWDP.AS and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer