IWB vs. VTWO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO).
IWB and VTWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. VTWO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. Both IWB and VTWO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWB or VTWO.
Correlation
The correlation between IWB and VTWO is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWB vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWB:
1.94
VTWO:
0.67
IWB:
2.59
VTWO:
1.07
IWB:
1.36
VTWO:
1.13
IWB:
2.93
VTWO:
0.74
IWB:
12.86
VTWO:
3.62
IWB:
1.92%
VTWO:
3.88%
IWB:
12.71%
VTWO:
20.95%
IWB:
-55.38%
VTWO:
-41.19%
IWB:
-4.21%
VTWO:
-8.60%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWB achieves a 23.71% return, which is significantly higher than VTWO's 11.51% return. Over the past 10 years, IWB has outperformed VTWO with an annualized return of 12.66%, while VTWO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.96% annualized return.
IWB
23.71%
-0.69%
8.01%
23.81%
14.13%
12.66%
VTWO
11.51%
-3.25%
10.83%
11.80%
7.47%
7.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWB vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWB vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWB vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison
IWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than VTWO's 0.84% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 0.83% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% | 1.71% | 1.68% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 0.84% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
Drawdowns
IWB vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWB drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than VTWO's maximum drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWB and VTWO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWB vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is 3.87%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that IWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.