IVW vs. IWF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF).
IVW and IWF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IVW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500/Citigroup Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. IWF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both IVW and IWF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IVW or IWF.
Correlation
The correlation between IVW and IWF is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IVW vs. IWF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IVW:
2.05
IWF:
1.94
IVW:
2.68
IWF:
2.54
IVW:
1.37
IWF:
1.36
IVW:
2.82
IWF:
2.53
IVW:
11.08
IWF:
9.89
IVW:
3.23%
IWF:
3.39%
IVW:
17.45%
IWF:
17.25%
IVW:
-57.33%
IWF:
-64.18%
IVW:
-3.48%
IWF:
-3.71%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVW achieves a 36.00% return, which is significantly higher than IWF's 33.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IVW has underperformed IWF with an annualized return of 14.98%, while IWF has yielded a comparatively higher 16.53% annualized return.
IVW
36.00%
2.16%
10.08%
37.60%
17.06%
14.98%
IWF
33.59%
2.54%
10.73%
35.21%
19.01%
16.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IVW vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVW has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IWF's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IVW vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IVW vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison
IVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than IWF's 0.46% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.43% | 1.03% | 0.89% | 0.46% | 0.82% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.51% | 1.37% | 1.45% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.50% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 1.33% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
IVW vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVW drawdown since its inception was -57.33%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVW and IWF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IVW vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) have volatilities of 4.65% and 4.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.