IVVW vs. AGM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) is Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Enhanced 1% OTM BuyWrite Index, while AGM (Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, IVVW returned 20.07% vs -3.78% for AGM. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IVVW vs. AGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVVW achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly higher than AGM's 0.57% return.

IVVW

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 1.90%
• YTD: 4.84%
• 6M: 6.58%
• 1Y: 20.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AGM

• 1D: -3.51%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: -3.78%
• 3Y*: 10.81%
• 5Y*: 15.40%
• 10Y*: 21.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVVW vs. AGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	4.84%	11.71%	12.90%
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation	0.57%	-7.96%	6.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IVVW and AGM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024	0.38

Return for Risk

IVVW vs. AGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVVW

IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 82
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 91
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 87

AGM

AGM Risk / Return Rank: 34
AGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
AGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
AGM Omega Ratio Rank: 31
AGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
AGM Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVVW vs. AGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVVW	AGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	-0.12	+2.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	0.05	+3.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.01	+0.60
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	-0.12	+3.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.13	-0.23	+19.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IVVW vs. AGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVVW Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the AGM Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVVW and AGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVVW	AGM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	-0.12	+2.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	0.32	+0.75

Drawdowns

IVVW vs. AGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVVW drawdown since its inception was -16.79%, smaller than the maximum AGM drawdown of -94.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVW and AGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVVW	AGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.79%	-94.63%	+77.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.81%	-31.94%	+26.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-32.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.54%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-15.22%	+15.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-27.87%	+26.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	16.82%	-15.77%

Volatility

IVVW vs. AGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) is 1.13%, while Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that IVVW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVVW	AGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.13%	9.34%	-8.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.07%	24.67%	-18.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.40%	31.97%	-24.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.66%	29.87%	-17.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.66%	34.50%	-21.84%

Dividends

IVVW vs. AGM - Dividend Comparison

IVVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.70%, more than AGM's 3.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation	3.49%	3.42%	2.84%	2.30%	3.37%	2.84%	4.31%	3.35%	3.84%	1.84%	1.82%	2.03%
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	19.70%	18.55%	13.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVVW and AGM in my portfolio?

IVVW and AGM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVVW or AGM?

AGM has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to IVVW (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVW dropped -16.79% vs AGM's -94.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.