IVV vs. IVW
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW).
IVV and IVW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. IVW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500/Citigroup Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both IVV and IVW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IVV or IVW.
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and IVW is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IVV vs. IVW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IVV:
2.21
IVW:
2.17
IVV:
2.92
IVW:
2.81
IVV:
1.41
IVW:
1.39
IVV:
3.35
IVW:
3.03
IVV:
14.00
IVW:
11.72
IVV:
2.01%
IVW:
3.29%
IVV:
12.79%
IVW:
17.80%
IVV:
-55.25%
IVW:
-57.33%
IVV:
-1.39%
IVW:
-1.43%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than IVW's 2.27% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has underperformed IVW with an annualized return of 13.35%, while IVW has yielded a comparatively higher 15.28% annualized return.
IVV
1.97%
1.17%
8.43%
25.54%
14.34%
13.35%
IVW
2.27%
1.04%
11.30%
34.42%
16.41%
15.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IVV vs. IVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IVW's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IVV vs. IVW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IVV
IVW
IVV vs. IVW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IVV vs. IVW - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than IVW's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.99% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% | 1.83% |
IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.43% | 1.03% | 0.89% | 0.46% | 0.82% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.51% | 1.37% |
Drawdowns
IVV vs. IVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, roughly equal to the maximum IVW drawdown of -57.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and IVW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IVV vs. IVW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 5.04%, while iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.