IVV vs. ITOT
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.17%/yr vs 14.68%/yr for ITOT. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
IVV vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVV having a 15.17% annualized return and ITOT not far behind at 14.68%.
IVV
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 21.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 21.88%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
IVV vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 10.84% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.42% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 20.71% | 30.67% | -5.33% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and ITOT is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2004 | 0.98 |
The correlation between IVV and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVV vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVV
ITOT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
IVV
ITOT
Financial Services
IVV
ITOT
Communication Services
IVV
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
IVV
ITOT
Healthcare
IVV
ITOT
Industrials
IVV
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
IVV
ITOT
Energy
IVV
ITOT
Utilities
IVV
ITOT
Real Estate
IVV
ITOT
Basic Materials
IVV
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVV vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
IVV
ITOT
IVV vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVV | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.31 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 2.47 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.68 | 10.77 | -0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVV vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, roughly equal to the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVV | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -55.20% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -8.90% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -19.44% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -25.36% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -35.00% | +1.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.57% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -6.94% | -3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.04% | 0.00% |
Volatility
IVV vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 3.69%. This indicates that IVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVV | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 3.69% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 10.13% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.58% | 12.85% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 17.47% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 18.25% | -0.20% |
IVV vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IVV and ITOT have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVV vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than ITOT's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, IVV and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IVV has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to ITOT (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.17% vs 14.68% for ITOT. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.17% return vs 14.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV and ITOT have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 1.00% for ITOT.
IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVV and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer