PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOG vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOG vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOG achieves a 19.25% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOG has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 11.61%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.61% annualized return.


IVOG

1D
0.27%
1M
5.95%
YTD
19.25%
6M
19.31%
1Y
30.31%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
11.61%

VONG

1D
-1.32%
1M
5.68%
YTD
7.17%
6M
6.52%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
15.38%
10Y*
18.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOG vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOG
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
19.25%7.34%15.62%17.36%-19.08%18.85%22.60%26.13%-10.58%19.90%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
7.17%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOG and VONG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.81

The correlation between IVOG and VONG shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVOG vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOG
VONG

Industrials

30.9%
5.7%

Technology

21.9%
51.4%

Healthcare

13.5%
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
13.2%

Financial Services

7.3%
5.3%

Real Estate

5.5%
0.4%

Energy

3.7%
0.4%

Basic Materials

3.6%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
2.7%

Utilities

2.0%
0.3%

Communication Services

1.5%
13.2%

Industrials

IVOG
30.9%
VONG
5.7%

Technology

IVOG
21.9%
VONG
51.4%

Healthcare

IVOG
13.5%
VONG
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOG
8.0%
VONG
13.2%

Financial Services

IVOG
7.3%
VONG
5.3%

Real Estate

IVOG
5.5%
VONG
0.4%

Energy

IVOG
3.7%
VONG
0.4%

Basic Materials

IVOG
3.6%
VONG
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

IVOG
2.1%
VONG
2.7%

Utilities

IVOG
2.0%
VONG
0.3%

Communication Services

IVOG
1.5%
VONG
13.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOG vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOG
IVOG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IVOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOG vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVOGVONGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.78

1.68

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.56

2.29

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

1.59

+1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.34

5.34

+7.00

IVOG vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOG and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVOGVONGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

1.68

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.72

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.89

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.90

-0.26

Drawdowns

IVOG vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOG drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOG and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOGVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.32%

-32.72%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-16.23%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.61%

-23.27%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

-32.72%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.32%

-32.72%

-6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.66%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-4.88%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

4.83%

-2.37%

Volatility

IVOG vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 3.60%. This indicates that IVOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOGVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

3.60%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.19%

11.61%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

15.37%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.61%

21.33%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

20.87%

-0.28%

IVOG vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOG vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

IVOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than VONG's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOG
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
0.54%0.64%0.79%1.15%1.05%0.47%0.74%1.17%1.01%0.93%1.11%1.04%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.43%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOG and VONG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVOG has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to VONG (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOG dropped -39.32% vs VONG's -32.72%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.61% vs 11.61% for IVOG. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.61% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IVOG.

IVOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.43% for VONG.

IVOG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IVOG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IVOG and 0.06% for VONG.

IVOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOG and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer