IVOG vs. IVV
IVOG (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVOG returned 11.58%/yr vs 15.62%/yr for IVV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVOG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
IVOG vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOG achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOG has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 11.58%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.
IVOG
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 18.93%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 31.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
IVV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 29.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 14.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.62%
IVOG vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | 18.93% | 7.34% | 15.62% | 17.36% | -19.08% | 18.85% | 22.60% | 26.13% | -10.58% | 19.90% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 11.70% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOG and IVV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IVOG and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVOG vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOG
IVV
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
IVOG
IVV
Technology
IVOG
IVV
Healthcare
IVOG
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
IVOG
IVV
Financial Services
IVOG
IVV
Real Estate
IVOG
IVV
Energy
IVOG
IVV
Basic Materials
IVOG
IVV
Consumer Defensive
IVOG
IVV
Utilities
IVOG
IVV
Communication Services
IVOG
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOG vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
IVOG
IVV
IVOG vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOG | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 2.54 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 3.44 | -0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.46 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.43 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | 15.97 | -3.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOG | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.54 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.85 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.87 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.46 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
IVOG vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOG drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOG and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOG | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.32% | -55.25% | +15.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -8.89% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.61% | -18.75% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.31% | -24.53% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.32% | -33.90% | -5.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -10.78% | +4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 1.91% | +0.55% |
Volatility
IVOG vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.75%. This indicates that IVOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOG | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 2.75% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.21% | 8.87% | +4.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.15% | 11.78% | +5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 16.88% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 18.05% | +2.54% |
IVOG vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVOG vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
IVOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than IVV's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | 0.54% | 0.64% | 0.79% | 1.15% | 1.05% | 0.47% | 0.74% | 1.17% | 1.01% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 1.04% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOG and IVV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVOG has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to IVV (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOG dropped -39.32% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.62% vs 11.58% for IVOG. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 11.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IVOG.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.54% for IVOG.
IVOG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. IVOG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IVOG and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOG and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer