PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVNQX vs. SWLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVNQX achieves a 20.97% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's 9.01% return.


IVNQX

1D
0.58%
1M
10.14%
YTD
20.97%
6M
19.55%
1Y
42.48%
3Y*
28.59%
5Y*
18.13%
10Y*

SWLGX

1D
0.74%
1M
7.30%
YTD
9.01%
6M
8.27%
1Y
28.78%
3Y*
25.70%
5Y*
15.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IVNQX
Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
20.97%20.77%25.43%54.62%-32.05%26.75%8.46%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
9.01%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%6.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IVNQX and SWLGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020

0.98

The correlation between IVNQX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVNQX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVNQX
IVNQX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IVNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IVNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVNQXSWLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.73

1.93

+0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.54

2.60

+0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.33

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

1.83

+1.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.09

6.16

+7.93

IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVNQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVNQX and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVNQXSWLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

1.93

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.74

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.80

+0.04

Drawdowns

IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVNQX drawdown since its inception was -34.83%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVNQX and SWLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVNQXSWLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.83%

-32.69%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.95%

-16.16%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-23.30%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.83%

-32.69%

-2.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-7.06%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

4.80%

-1.70%

Volatility

IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 3.23%. This indicates that IVNQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVNQXSWLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

3.23%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.19%

11.59%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12%

15.43%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.50%

21.49%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.42%

22.68%

-0.26%

IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVNQX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

IVNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than SWLGX's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IVNQX
Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
1.08%1.31%0.72%0.54%0.73%0.84%0.19%0.00%0.00%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.42%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IVNQX and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVNQX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to SWLGX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVNQX dropped -34.83% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

IVNQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVNQX and SWLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer