IVNQX vs. SWLGX
IVNQX (Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund) and SWLGX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, IVNQX returned 18.13%/yr vs 15.93%/yr for SWLGX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IVNQX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWLGX.
Performance
IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVNQX achieves a 20.97% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's 9.01% return.
IVNQX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 10.14%
- YTD
- 20.97%
- 6M
- 19.55%
- 1Y
- 42.48%
- 3Y*
- 28.59%
- 5Y*
- 18.13%
- 10Y*
- —
SWLGX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 9.01%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 28.78%
- 3Y*
- 25.70%
- 5Y*
- 15.93%
- 10Y*
- —
IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVNQX Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund | 20.97% | 20.77% | 25.43% | 54.62% | -32.05% | 26.75% | 8.46% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 9.01% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 6.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVNQX and SWLGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between IVNQX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVNQX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
IVNQX
SWLGX
IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVNQX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.73 | 1.93 | +0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.54 | 2.60 | +0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.33 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 1.83 | +1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.09 | 6.16 | +7.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVNQX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 1.93 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.74 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.80 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVNQX drawdown since its inception was -34.83%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVNQX and SWLGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVNQX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.83% | -32.69% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.95% | -16.16% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -23.30% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.83% | -32.69% | -2.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -7.06% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 4.80% | -1.70% |
Volatility
IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 3.23%. This indicates that IVNQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVNQX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 3.23% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.19% | 11.59% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 15.43% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 21.49% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 22.68% | -0.26% |
IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVNQX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVNQX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
IVNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than SWLGX's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVNQX Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund | 1.08% | 1.31% | 0.72% | 0.54% | 0.73% | 0.84% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.42% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IVNQX and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IVNQX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to SWLGX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVNQX dropped -34.83% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.
IVNQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVNQX and SWLGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer