PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVNQX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVNQX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVNQX achieves a 21.22% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.78% return.


IVNQX

1D
-0.29%
1M
9.15%
YTD
21.22%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.25%
3Y*
28.68%
5Y*
18.01%
10Y*

SCHG

1D
0.35%
1M
4.73%
YTD
6.78%
6M
6.01%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
18.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVNQX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IVNQX
Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
21.22%20.77%25.43%54.62%-32.05%26.75%8.46%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.78%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IVNQX and SCHG is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020

0.98

The correlation between IVNQX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVNQX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVNQX
IVNQX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IVNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IVNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVNQX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVNQXSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.28

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

1.51

+2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.52

5.04

+8.48

IVNQX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVNQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVNQX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVNQXSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

1.60

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.71

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.85

0.00

Drawdowns

IVNQX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVNQX drawdown since its inception was -34.83%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVNQX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVNQXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.83%

-34.59%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.95%

-16.41%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-23.39%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.83%

-34.59%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-1.44%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.23%

-5.20%

-3.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

4.90%

-1.80%

Volatility

IVNQX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that IVNQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVNQXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

3.61%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

11.62%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

15.49%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.49%

22.26%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

21.55%

+0.86%

IVNQX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVNQX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVNQX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

IVNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVNQX
Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
1.08%1.31%0.72%0.54%0.73%0.84%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IVNQX and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVNQX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVNQX dropped -34.83% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

IVNQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVNQX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer