IUSV vs. IWF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF).
IUSV and IWF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUSV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2500 Value Index. It was launched on Aug 4, 2000. IWF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both IUSV and IWF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IUSV or IWF.
Key characteristics
| IUSV | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.09% | 6.63% |
| 1Y Return | 17.96% | 31.67% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.79% | 8.31% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.36% | 16.50% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.91% | 15.29% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.57 | 2.11 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.31% | 15.02% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.18% | -64.18% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.35% | -4.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSV and IWF is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IUSV vs. IWF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IUSV achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than IWF's 6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSV has underperformed IWF with an annualized return of 9.91%, while IWF has yielded a comparatively higher 15.29% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUSV vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IWF's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IUSV vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IUSV vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison
IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than IWF's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 1.81% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 2.40% | 2.19% | 2.67% | 1.93% | 2.18% | 2.54% | 1.86% | 1.95% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.60% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.49% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 1.32% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
IUSV vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -60.18%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and IWF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IUSV vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) is 3.16%, while iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that IUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.