IUSV vs. IWF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IUSV (iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF) and IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Value Index, while IWF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSV returned 12.06%/yr vs 18.47%/yr for IWF. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUSV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IWF.

Performance

IUSV vs. IWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSV achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than IWF's 7.28% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSV has underperformed IWF with an annualized return of 12.06%, while IWF has yielded a comparatively higher 18.47% annualized return.

IUSV

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 9.11%
• 1Y: 22.73%
• 3Y*: 16.12%
• 5Y*: 10.67%
• 10Y*: 12.06%

IWF

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: 7.28%
• 6M: 6.46%
• 1Y: 25.41%
• 3Y*: 24.91%
• 5Y*: 15.28%
• 10Y*: 18.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSV vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF	8.61%	12.85%	12.18%	21.73%	-5.40%	25.22%	1.56%	31.47%	-9.21%	15.09%
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	7.28%	18.33%	33.12%	42.59%	-29.31%	27.43%	38.25%	35.86%	-1.67%	29.95%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSV and IWF is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2000	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between IUSV and IWF has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IUSV vs. IWF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IUSV	IWF
Technology	20.8%	53.2%
Financial Services	15.0%	4.9%
Industrials	11.2%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	12.7%
Healthcare	11.0%	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	8.8%	2.5%
Energy	7.2%	0.4%
Utilities	4.3%	1.1%
Real Estate	3.7%	0.4%
Basic Materials	3.6%	0.3%
Communication Services	3.1%	12.3%

Return for Risk

IUSV vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSV

IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 72
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 70
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 74

IWF

IWF Risk / Return Rank: 42
IWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
IWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
IWF Omega Ratio Rank: 47
IWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
IWF Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSV vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IUSV	IWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	1.65	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	2.27	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.29	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.59	1.57	+2.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.74	5.24	+8.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUSV vs. IWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSV Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the IWF Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSV and IWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IUSV	IWF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	1.65	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.72	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.88	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.40	+0.21

Drawdowns

IUSV vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and IWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUSV	IWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.88%	-64.25%	+7.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.36%	-16.27%	+9.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.76%	-23.36%	+5.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.95%	-32.72%	+14.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.54%	-32.72%	-4.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.51%	+1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-22.08%	+15.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.66%	4.86%	-3.20%

Volatility

IUSV vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) is 2.13%, while iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that IUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IUSV	IWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.13%	3.60%	-1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.19%	11.65%	-4.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.00%	15.43%	-5.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.56%	21.39%	-6.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.07%	20.96%	-3.89%

IUSV vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IWF's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IUSV vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison

IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than IWF's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF	1.67%	1.78%	2.15%	1.75%	2.22%	1.87%	2.40%	2.19%	2.67%	1.93%	4.44%	7.63%
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.33%	0.36%	0.46%	0.67%	0.91%	0.49%	0.66%	0.99%	1.27%	1.10%	1.43%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUSV and IWF in my portfolio?

IUSV and IWF have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IUSV or IWF?

IWF has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to IUSV (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSV dropped -56.88% vs IWF's -64.25%.

Which ETF is better, IUSV or IWF?

On 10-year performance, IWF leads with 18.47% vs 12.06% for IUSV. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IUSV or IWF?

Over the 10-year period, IWF has performed better with a 18.47% return vs 12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUSV or IWF?

IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IWF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IUSV or IWF?

IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.33% for IWF.

What is the main difference between IUSV and IWF?

IUSV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IWF is Large Cap Growth Equities. IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index, while IWF tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSV and 0.18% for IWF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IUSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.