PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IUSV vs. IWF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

IUSV vs. IWF

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF).

IUSV and IWF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUSV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 900 Value Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. IWF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both IUSV and IWF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IUSV vs. IWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IUSV vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF		0.24%12.85%12.18%21.73%-5.40%25.22%1.56%31.47%-9.21%15.09%
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF		-9.05%18.33%33.12%42.59%-29.31%27.43%38.25%35.86%-1.67%29.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSV achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly higher than IWF's -9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSV has underperformed IWF with an annualized return of 11.61%, while IWF has yielded a comparatively higher 16.63% annualized return.

IUSV

1D
0.14%
1M
-4.43%
YTD
0.24%
6M
3.09%
1Y
13.16%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
11.61%

IWF

1D
0.87%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
-9.05%
6M
-8.54%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
16.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

Often compared with IUSV:
IUSV vs. IUSGIUSV vs. VTVIUSV vs. SCHDIUSV vs. SPYIUSV vs. VOOIUSV vs. VLUEIUSV vs. DGRO
Often compared with IWF:
IWF vs. IWDIWF vs. VUGIWF vs. SPYIWF vs. IWMIWF vs. VOOIWF vs. VONGIWF vs. IWY

IUSV vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IWF's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF

Return for Risk

IUSV vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IUSV
IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
IWF
IWF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWF Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWF Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSV vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IUSVIWFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

0.84

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

1.35

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

1.20

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.98

4.08

+0.91

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUSV vs. IWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSV Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the IWF Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSV and IWF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IUSVIWFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

0.84

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.58

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.80

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.37

+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between IUSV and IWF is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IUSV vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison

IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than IWF's 0.39% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF		1.80%1.78%2.15%1.75%2.22%1.87%2.40%2.19%2.67%1.93%4.44%7.63%
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF		0.39%0.36%0.46%0.67%0.91%0.49%0.66%0.99%1.27%1.10%1.43%1.37%

Drawdowns

IUSV vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and IWF.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

IUSVIWFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.88%

-64.25%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-16.27%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.95%

-32.72%

+14.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.54%

-32.72%

-4.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.51%

-12.36%

+7.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-22.21%

+15.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

4.80%

-2.19%

Volatility

IUSV vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) is 3.86%, while iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that IUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

IUSVIWFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

6.82%

-2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.79%

12.39%

-4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

22.41%

-6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

21.41%

-6.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.08%

20.92%

-3.84%