PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSV vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSV vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IUSV having a 10.38% return and ITOT slightly higher at 10.57%. Over the past 10 years, IUSV has underperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 11.91%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.


IUSV

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.64%
6M
7.56%
YTD
10.38%
1Y
21.41%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
11.91%
ALL TIME*
11.49%

ITOT

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.09%
6M
8.89%
YTD
10.57%
1Y
21.81%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
14.60%
ALL TIME*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$209.16M$238.83M$306.83M
$60.14M$63.62M$70.42M

IUSV vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
10.38%12.85%12.18%21.73%-5.40%25.22%1.56%31.47%-9.21%15.09%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
10.57%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSV and ITOT is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2004

0.91

The correlation between IUSV and ITOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IUSV vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSV
ITOT

Technology

20.4%
36.4%

Financial Services

16.1%
11.9%

Healthcare

11.9%
9.5%

Industrials

11.2%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
4.3%

Energy

7.3%
3.1%

Utilities

4.4%
2.2%

Real Estate

3.8%
2.3%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.9%

Communication Services

2.7%
9.1%

Technology

IUSV
20.4%
ITOT
36.4%

Financial Services

IUSV
16.1%
ITOT
11.9%

Healthcare

IUSV
11.9%
ITOT
9.5%

Industrials

IUSV
11.2%
ITOT
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSV
10.0%
ITOT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

IUSV
8.5%
ITOT
4.3%

Energy

IUSV
7.3%
ITOT
3.1%

Utilities

IUSV
4.4%
ITOT
2.2%

Real Estate

IUSV
3.8%
ITOT
2.3%

Basic Materials

IUSV
3.6%
ITOT
1.9%

Communication Services

IUSV
2.7%
ITOT
9.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSV vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IUSV
IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IUSV vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSVITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.27

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

2.23

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.16

9.56

+2.60

IUSV vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSV Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSV and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSV vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, roughly equal to the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSVITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.88%

-55.20%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-8.90%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-19.44%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.95%

-25.36%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.54%

-35.00%

-2.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-1.34%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-6.93%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

2.07%

-0.43%

Volatility

IUSV vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) is 2.67%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that IUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSVITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

3.52%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

10.27%

-3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.10%

13.14%

-3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

17.47%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

18.27%

-1.28%

IUSV vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSV vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than ITOT's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
1.66%1.78%2.15%1.75%2.22%1.87%2.40%2.19%2.67%1.93%4.44%7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSV and ITOT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITOT has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to IUSV (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSV dropped -56.88% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 14.60% vs 11.91% for IUSV. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 14.60% return vs 11.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for IUSV.

IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.01% for ITOT.

IUSV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSV and 0.03% for ITOT.

IUSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSV and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer