IUSQ.DE vs. CI2G.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) and Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L).
IUSQ.DE and CI2G.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUSQ.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World (ACWI). It was launched on Oct 21, 2011. CI2G.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI India NR USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. Both IUSQ.DE and CI2G.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IUSQ.DE or CI2G.L.
Key characteristics
| IUSQ.DE | CI2G.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.81% | 18.85% |
| 1Y Return | 19.34% | 26.69% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.15% | 11.13% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.06% | 14.82% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.04 | 1.86 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.67% | 14.59% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.60% | -37.13% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.70% | -1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSQ.DE and CI2G.L is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IUSQ.DE vs. CI2G.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IUSQ.DE achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly lower than CI2G.L's 18.85% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUSQ.DE vs. CI2G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSQ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CI2G.L's 0.80% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IUSQ.DE vs. CI2G.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) and Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IUSQ.DE vs. CI2G.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUSQ.DE nor CI2G.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IUSQ.DE vs. CI2G.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, smaller than the maximum CI2G.L drawdown of -37.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSQ.DE and CI2G.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IUSQ.DE vs. CI2G.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L) at 3.15%. This indicates that IUSQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CI2G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.