IUSG vs. BUL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL).
IUSG and BUL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUSG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Growth Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. BUL is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index. It was launched on May 2, 2019. Both IUSG and BUL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IUSG vs. BUL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IUSG vs. BUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | -6.29% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -28.81% | 31.26% | 32.65% | 9.58% |
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | -0.64% | 19.18% | 27.39% | 3.68% | -16.18% | 32.48% | 27.26% | 4.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a -6.29% return, which is significantly lower than BUL's -0.64% return.
IUSG
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -4.30%
- YTD
- -6.29%
- 6M
- -4.63%
- 1Y
- 23.27%
- 3Y*
- 21.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 15.66%
BUL
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 3.80%
- 1Y
- 25.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.35%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUSG vs. BUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BUL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IUSG vs. BUL — Risk / Return Rank
IUSG
BUL
IUSG vs. BUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUSG | BUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.08 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.70 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 1.83 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | 8.06 | -0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUSG | BUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.08 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.43 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.53 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSG and BUL is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IUSG vs. BUL - Dividend Comparison
IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than BUL's 0.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.57% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | 0.25% | 0.28% | 0.30% | 2.11% | 0.67% | 0.08% | 0.69% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IUSG vs. BUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than BUL's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and BUL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSG | BUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -37.08% | -26.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -13.57% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.21% | -27.85% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.34% | -4.90% | -3.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -7.79% | -13.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 3.09% | +0.28% |
Volatility
IUSG vs. BUL - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) at 6.10%. This indicates that IUSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IUSG | BUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.27% | 6.10% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 12.11% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.05% | 23.20% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 21.77% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 24.39% | -4.05% |