IUSB vs. GTIP
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB) and Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP).
IUSB and GTIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Universal Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. GTIP is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. Both IUSB and GTIP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IUSB or GTIP.
Correlation
The correlation between IUSB and GTIP is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IUSB vs. GTIP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IUSB:
1.39
GTIP:
1.55
IUSB:
2.04
GTIP:
2.19
IUSB:
1.24
GTIP:
1.28
IUSB:
0.61
GTIP:
0.66
IUSB:
3.79
GTIP:
4.55
IUSB:
1.86%
GTIP:
1.55%
IUSB:
5.06%
GTIP:
4.54%
IUSB:
-17.98%
GTIP:
-14.31%
IUSB:
-4.96%
GTIP:
-4.15%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSB achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly lower than GTIP's 3.50% return.
IUSB
2.22%
0.02%
1.45%
7.14%
-0.28%
1.64%
GTIP
3.50%
0.36%
2.13%
7.17%
1.52%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUSB vs. GTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than GTIP's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IUSB vs. GTIP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IUSB
GTIP
IUSB vs. GTIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB) and Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IUSB vs. GTIP - Dividend Comparison
IUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, which matches GTIP's 4.09% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSB iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF | 4.09% | 4.04% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.45% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% | 1.39% |
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 4.09% | 3.52% | 2.77% | 6.47% | 3.82% | 1.04% | 2.34% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IUSB vs. GTIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSB drawdown since its inception was -17.98%, which is greater than GTIP's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSB and GTIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IUSB vs. GTIP - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB) and Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) have volatilities of 2.18% and 2.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.