PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUS vs. BNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUS vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUS achieves a 15.71% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 0.54% return.


IUS

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.89%
YTD
15.71%
6M
15.69%
1Y
33.27%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*

BNDX

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.63%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.23%
1Y
1.82%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*
1.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUS vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUS
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF
15.71%16.94%16.51%20.79%-8.34%32.17%15.09%29.34%-12.49%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
0.54%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IUS and BNDX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.06

Over the past year, IUS and BNDX have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

IUS vs. BNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUS
BNDX

Technology

22.4%

-

Communication Services

14.7%
0.0%

Healthcare

12.8%
0.0%

Energy

10.9%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%

-

Industrials

9.7%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%

-

Financial Services

6.8%
0.0%

Basic Materials

3.3%

-

Utilities

1.0%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.5%
0.0%

Technology

IUS
22.4%
BNDX

-

Communication Services

IUS
14.7%
BNDX
0.0%

Healthcare

IUS
12.8%
BNDX
0.0%

Energy

IUS
10.9%
BNDX
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IUS
10.7%
BNDX

-

Industrials

IUS
9.7%
BNDX
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

IUS
7.4%
BNDX

-

Financial Services

IUS
6.8%
BNDX
0.0%

Basic Materials

IUS
3.3%
BNDX

-

Utilities

IUS
1.0%
BNDX
0.0%

Real Estate

IUS
0.5%
BNDX
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUS vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUS
IUS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUS vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUSBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.10

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.44

0.62

+4.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.27

1.78

+21.49

IUS vs. BNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUS Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the BNDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUS and BNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUSBNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

0.53

+2.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.07

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.61

+0.25

Drawdowns

IUS vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUS drawdown since its inception was -34.67%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS and BNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.67%

-16.23%

-18.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-2.93%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.61%

-2.93%

-12.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.72%

-15.86%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-1.49%

+1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-3.09%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

1.02%

+0.41%

Volatility

IUS vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 1.57%. This indicates that IUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

1.57%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.41%

2.91%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.26%

3.43%

+6.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

4.88%

+10.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

4.09%

+13.95%

IUS vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUS vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison

IUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than BNDX's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.49%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
IUS
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF
1.28%1.48%1.52%1.72%1.78%1.46%1.74%1.77%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUS and BNDX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IUS has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to BNDX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUS dropped -34.67% vs BNDX's -16.23%.

On 5-year performance, IUS leads with 13.61% vs 0.33% for BNDX. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IUS has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 0.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IUS.

BNDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 1.28% for IUS.

IUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BNDX is Global Bonds. IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index, while BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IUS and 0.07% for BNDX.

IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUS and BNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer