PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IUMF.L vs. XDEQ.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


IUMF.LXDEQ.L
YTD Return20.73%13.77%
1Y Return27.10%19.98%
3Y Return (Ann)5.93%9.32%
5Y Return (Ann)10.08%11.86%
Sharpe Ratio1.591.83
Daily Std Dev17.97%11.33%
Max Drawdown-25.23%-23.79%
Current Drawdown-6.21%-2.04%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between IUMF.L and XDEQ.L is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

IUMF.L vs. XDEQ.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IUMF.L achieves a 20.73% return, which is significantly higher than XDEQ.L's 13.77% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


130.00%140.00%150.00%160.00%170.00%180.00%190.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
178.84%
160.73%
IUMF.L
XDEQ.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IUMF.L vs. XDEQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUMF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEQ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


XDEQ.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
Expense ratio chart for XDEQ.L: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for IUMF.L: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IUMF.L vs. XDEQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (IUMF.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUMF.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IUMF.L, currently valued at 1.90, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.90
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IUMF.L, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.53
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IUMF.L, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IUMF.L, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IUMF.L, currently valued at 9.89, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.89
XDEQ.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XDEQ.L, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XDEQ.L, currently valued at 3.03, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.03
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XDEQ.L, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XDEQ.L, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.23
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XDEQ.L, currently valued at 11.29, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0011.29

IUMF.L vs. XDEQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUMF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which roughly equals the XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of IUMF.L and XDEQ.L.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.90
2.14
IUMF.L
XDEQ.L

Dividends

IUMF.L vs. XDEQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUMF.L nor XDEQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IUMF.L
IShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDEQ.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.51%

Drawdowns

IUMF.L vs. XDEQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUMF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.23%, which is greater than XDEQ.L's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMF.L and XDEQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-4.18%
-1.39%
IUMF.L
XDEQ.L

Volatility

IUMF.L vs. XDEQ.L - Volatility Comparison

IShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (IUMF.L) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) at 4.30%. This indicates that IUMF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
6.86%
4.30%
IUMF.L
XDEQ.L