IUES.L vs. VWRL.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS).
IUES.L and VWRL.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUES.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. VWRL.AS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2012. Both IUES.L and VWRL.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IUES.L or VWRL.AS.
Key characteristics
| IUES.L | VWRL.AS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.64% | 24.71% |
| 1Y Return | 14.06% | 30.21% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 21.99% | 8.56% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.28% | 11.89% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.75 | 2.87 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.10 | 3.80 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.14 | 1.59 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.98 | 3.72 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.49 | 18.20 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.50% | 1.65% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.09% | 10.43% |
| Max Drawdown | -66.78% | -33.27% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.46% | -0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUES.L and VWRL.AS is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IUES.L vs. VWRL.AS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IUES.L achieves a 14.64% return, which is significantly lower than VWRL.AS's 24.71% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUES.L vs. VWRL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUES.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRL.AS's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IUES.L vs. VWRL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IUES.L vs. VWRL.AS - Dividend Comparison
IUES.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRL.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VWRL.AS Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 1.43% | 1.74% | 2.10% | 1.43% | 1.56% | 1.89% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 1.95% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 1.57% |
Drawdowns
IUES.L vs. VWRL.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUES.L drawdown since its inception was -66.78%, which is greater than VWRL.AS's maximum drawdown of -33.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUES.L and VWRL.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IUES.L vs. VWRL.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS) at 2.99%. This indicates that IUES.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.