IUES.L vs. INRG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L).
IUES.L and INRG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUES.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. INRG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. It was launched on Jul 9, 2007. Both IUES.L and INRG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IUES.L or INRG.L.
Key characteristics
| IUES.L | INRG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.49% | -22.15% |
| 1Y Return | 16.59% | -8.12% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 22.00% | -19.16% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.40% | 4.02% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.83 | -0.36 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.19 | -0.39 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 0.96 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.07 | -0.14 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.73 | -0.74 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.50% | 11.30% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.17% | 23.12% |
| Max Drawdown | -66.78% | -84.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.59% | -60.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUES.L and INRG.L is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IUES.L vs. INRG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IUES.L achieves a 14.49% return, which is significantly higher than INRG.L's -22.15% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUES.L vs. INRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUES.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than INRG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IUES.L vs. INRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IUES.L vs. INRG.L - Dividend Comparison
IUES.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INRG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.26% | 1.00% | 0.62% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 2.05% | 3.68% | 3.69% | 3.65% | 3.90% | 3.05% | 2.70% |
Drawdowns
IUES.L vs. INRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUES.L drawdown since its inception was -66.78%, smaller than the maximum INRG.L drawdown of -84.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUES.L and INRG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IUES.L vs. INRG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) is 4.65%, while iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that IUES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.