IUCM.L vs. XLC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC).
IUCM.L and XLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUCM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. It was launched on Sep 17, 2018. XLC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. It was launched on Jun 18, 2018. Both IUCM.L and XLC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IUCM.L or XLC.
Performance
IUCM.L vs. XLC - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IUCM.L having a 33.14% return and XLC slightly lower at 32.05%.
IUCM.L
33.14%
4.87%
13.24%
39.19%
13.55%
N/A
XLC
32.05%
4.57%
15.84%
37.25%
13.90%
N/A
Key characteristics
IUCM.L | XLC | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 2.60 | 2.52 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.64 | 3.36 |
Omega Ratio | 1.48 | 1.45 |
Calmar Ratio | 2.08 | 2.04 |
Martin Ratio | 14.77 | 20.65 |
Ulcer Index | 2.65% | 1.83% |
Daily Std Dev | 15.01% | 15.01% |
Max Drawdown | -47.32% | -46.66% |
Current Drawdown | -1.61% | -2.11% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUCM.L vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUCM.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between IUCM.L and XLC is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IUCM.L vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IUCM.L vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison
IUCM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.93% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.81% | 0.64% |
Drawdowns
IUCM.L vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUCM.L drawdown since its inception was -47.32%, roughly equal to the maximum XLC drawdown of -46.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUCM.L and XLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IUCM.L vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) at 4.18%. This indicates that IUCM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.