ITOT vs. SPTM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM).
ITOT and SPTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ITOT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Jan 20, 2004. SPTM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2000. Both ITOT and SPTM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ITOT or SPTM.
Key characteristics
| ITOT | SPTM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.05% | 5.62% |
| 1Y Return | 22.37% | 22.21% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.18% | 7.66% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.54% | 13.05% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.89% | 12.07% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.84 | 1.89 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.13% | 11.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.21% | -54.80% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.38% | -4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITOT and SPTM is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ITOT vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 5.05% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 5.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ITOT having a 11.89% annualized return and SPTM not far ahead at 12.07%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ITOT vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ITOT and SPTM have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ITOT vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ITOT vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than SPTM's 1.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.37% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% | 2.20% | 2.06% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.39% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% | 2.08% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
ITOT vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.21%, roughly equal to the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and SPTM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ITOT vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) at 3.81%. This indicates that ITOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.