ITB vs. GUNR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR).
ITB and GUNR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ITB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. It was launched on May 1, 2006. GUNR is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Sep 16, 2011. Both ITB and GUNR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ITB or GUNR.
Key characteristics
| ITB | GUNR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.13% | -1.91% |
| 1Y Return | 48.76% | -2.91% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 22.28% | 6.44% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 24.83% | 8.11% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 18.71% | 4.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.87 | -0.06 |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.30% | 15.30% |
| Max Drawdown | -86.53% | -45.64% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -11.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and GUNR is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ITB vs. GUNR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a 22.13% return, which is significantly higher than GUNR's -1.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ITB has outperformed GUNR with an annualized return of 18.71%, while GUNR has yielded a comparatively lower 4.42% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ITB vs. GUNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than GUNR's 0.46% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ITB vs. GUNR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ITB vs. GUNR - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than GUNR's 3.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.39% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.34% | 0.12% |
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund | 2.66% | 3.55% | 4.12% | 3.61% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.27% | 2.00% | 1.73% | 4.50% | 2.80% | 2.03% |
Drawdowns
ITB vs. GUNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than GUNR's maximum drawdown of -45.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and GUNR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ITB vs. GUNR - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) at 4.94%. This indicates that ITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.