ISPA.DE vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
ISPA.DE and QYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISPA.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Global Select Dividend 100 index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013. Both ISPA.DE and QYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ISPA.DE or QYLD.
Correlation
The correlation between ISPA.DE and QYLD is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ISPA.DE vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ISPA.DE:
1.89
QYLD:
1.74
ISPA.DE:
2.52
QYLD:
2.37
ISPA.DE:
1.34
QYLD:
1.40
ISPA.DE:
2.88
QYLD:
2.43
ISPA.DE:
11.30
QYLD:
12.86
ISPA.DE:
1.70%
QYLD:
1.46%
ISPA.DE:
10.22%
QYLD:
10.86%
ISPA.DE:
-38.91%
QYLD:
-24.75%
ISPA.DE:
0.00%
QYLD:
-1.70%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISPA.DE achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ISPA.DE has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 5.59%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.79% annualized return.
ISPA.DE
4.01%
2.34%
9.63%
18.44%
5.74%
5.59%
QYLD
2.74%
-0.11%
10.07%
17.21%
7.63%
8.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISPA.DE vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISPA.DE has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ISPA.DE vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ISPA.DE
QYLD
ISPA.DE vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ISPA.DE vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
ISPA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, less than QYLD's 11.38% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISPA.DE iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) | 4.76% | 4.89% | 5.91% | 4.87% | 3.32% | 4.04% | 4.02% | 3.37% | 5.66% | 3.64% | 4.35% | 3.36% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.38% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% | 10.74% |
Drawdowns
ISPA.DE vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISPA.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISPA.DE and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ISPA.DE vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) is 1.61%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that ISPA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.