ISF.L vs. VWRL.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS).
ISF.L and VWRL.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISF.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. It was launched on Apr 27, 2000. VWRL.AS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2012. Both ISF.L and VWRL.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ISF.L or VWRL.AS.
Performance
ISF.L vs. VWRL.AS - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISF.L achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than VWRL.AS's 23.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ISF.L has underperformed VWRL.AS with an annualized return of 5.70%, while VWRL.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.61% annualized return.
ISF.L
8.26%
-2.64%
-2.13%
11.85%
5.79%
5.70%
VWRL.AS
23.67%
1.71%
9.80%
29.00%
11.77%
10.61%
Key characteristics
| ISF.L | VWRL.AS | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.25 | 2.64 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.84 | 3.51 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.22 | 1.54 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.53 | 3.44 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.91 | 16.80 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.74% | 1.66% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.56% | 10.48% |
| Max Drawdown | -68.40% | -33.27% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.95% | -1.01% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISF.L vs. VWRL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISF.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRL.AS's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between ISF.L and VWRL.AS is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ISF.L vs. VWRL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ISF.L vs. VWRL.AS - Dividend Comparison
ISF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than VWRL.AS's 1.45% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 3.85% | 3.86% | 3.75% | 3.76% | 3.11% | 4.47% | 4.44% | 3.96% | 3.79% | 4.12% | 3.41% | 3.29% |
VWRL.AS Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 1.45% | 1.74% | 2.10% | 1.43% | 1.56% | 1.89% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 1.95% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 1.57% |
Drawdowns
ISF.L vs. VWRL.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISF.L drawdown since its inception was -68.40%, which is greater than VWRL.AS's maximum drawdown of -33.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISF.L and VWRL.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ISF.L vs. VWRL.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS) at 3.25%. This indicates that ISF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.