ISAC.L vs. SMEA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L).
ISAC.L and SMEA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISAC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2001. SMEA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both ISAC.L and SMEA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ISAC.L or SMEA.L.
Key characteristics
| ISAC.L | SMEA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.46% | 7.27% |
| 1Y Return | 24.16% | 13.85% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.38% | 7.20% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.33% | 7.50% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.68% | 7.54% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.05 | 1.36 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.09% | 10.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.82% | -28.48% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.19% | -2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISAC.L and SMEA.L is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ISAC.L vs. SMEA.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ISAC.L achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly higher than SMEA.L's 7.27% return. Over the past 10 years, ISAC.L has outperformed SMEA.L with an annualized return of 8.68%, while SMEA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.54% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISAC.L vs. SMEA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SMEA.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ISAC.L vs. SMEA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ISAC.L vs. SMEA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISAC.L nor SMEA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ISAC.L vs. SMEA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISAC.L drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, which is greater than SMEA.L's maximum drawdown of -28.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISAC.L and SMEA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ISAC.L vs. SMEA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.