IRWD vs. IMVT
IRWD (Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and IMVT (Immunovant, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — IRWD in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic, IMVT in Biotechnology. Over the past 5 years, IRWD returned -22.83%/yr vs 25.69%/yr for IMVT. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IRWD vs. IMVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRWD achieves a -3.86% return, which is significantly lower than IMVT's 22.54% return.
IRWD
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -29.41%
- YTD
- -3.86%
- 6M
- -13.14%
- 1Y
- 431.23%
- 3Y*
- -33.53%
- 5Y*
- -22.83%
- 10Y*
- -12.94%
IMVT
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 11.85%
- YTD
- 22.54%
- 6M
- 37.16%
- 1Y
- 101.75%
- 3Y*
- 14.67%
- 5Y*
- 25.69%
- 10Y*
- —
IRWD vs. IMVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRWD Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | -3.86% | -23.93% | -61.28% | -7.67% | 6.26% | 2.37% | -14.43% | -1.48% |
IMVT Immunovant, Inc. | 22.54% | 2.62% | -41.21% | 137.35% | 108.33% | -81.55% | 191.05% | -0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRWD and IMVT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
IRWD:
$540.08M
IMVT:
$6.35B
IRWD:
$0.88
IMVT:
-$2.77
IRWD:
$361.51M
IMVT:
$0.00
IRWD:
$254.55M
IMVT:
-$206.00K
IRWD:
$204.95M
IMVT:
-$527.21M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRWD vs. IMVT — Risk / Return Rank
IRWD
IMVT
IRWD vs. IMVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (IRWD) and Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRWD | IMVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.00 | 1.64 | +2.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.01 | 2.92 | +1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.32 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.97 | 4.88 | +5.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.28 | 11.26 | +12.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRWD | IMVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00 | 1.64 | +2.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 0.35 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | 0.14 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
IRWD vs. IMVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRWD drawdown since its inception was -97.31%, roughly equal to the maximum IMVT drawdown of -93.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRWD and IMVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRWD | IMVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.31% | -93.59% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.60% | -20.98% | -22.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.33% | -69.88% | -26.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.33% | -70.38% | -25.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.62% | -40.90% | -43.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.25% | -54.01% | +14.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.64% | 9.07% | +9.57% |
Volatility
IRWD vs. IMVT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (IRWD) is 21.72%, while Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) has a volatility of 33.78%. This indicates that IRWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRWD | IMVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.72% | 33.78% | -12.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.68% | 44.71% | +15.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.86% | 62.24% | +46.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.10% | 74.80% | -1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.93% | 78.28% | -17.35% |
Dividends
IRWD vs. IMVT - Dividend Comparison
Neither IRWD nor IMVT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
IRWD vs. IMVT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Immunovant, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
IRWD and IMVT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMVT has higher volatility (33.78%) compared to IRWD (21.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRWD dropped -97.31% vs IMVT's -93.59%.
IRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRWD and IMVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer