IR vs. EME
Compare and contrast key facts about Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IR or EME.
Key characteristics
| IR | EME | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 20.92% | 64.58% |
| 1Y Return | 64.22% | 107.19% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 22.40% | 43.82% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 29.71% | 35.31% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.39 | 4.66 |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.21% | 26.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.12% | -70.56% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.85% | -2.94% |
Fundamentals
| IR | EME | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $35.66B | $15.47B |
| EPS | $1.90 | $13.31 |
| PE Ratio | 46.53 | 24.69 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.47 | 1.32 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.88B | $12.58B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.33B | $1.60B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.70B | $995.95M |
Correlation
The correlation between IR and EME is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IR vs. EME - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IR achieves a 20.92% return, which is significantly lower than EME's 64.58% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IR vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IR vs. EME - Dividend Comparison
IR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than EME's 0.22% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IR Ingersoll-Rand Plc | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.03% | 2.33% | 5.78% | 9.58% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EME EMCOR Group, Inc. | 0.22% | 0.32% | 0.36% | 0.41% | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.67% | 0.72% | 0.42% |
Drawdowns
IR vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IR drawdown since its inception was -49.12%, smaller than the maximum EME drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IR and EME. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IR vs. EME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) is 5.75%, while EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that IR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
IR vs. EME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ingersoll-Rand Plc and EMCOR Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities