IQSI vs. DMXF
IQSI (IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF) and DMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IQSI tracks the IQ Candriam ESG International Equity Index while DMXF tracks the MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQSI returned 7.66%/yr vs 6.83%/yr for DMXF. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQSI charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DMXF.
Performance
IQSI vs. DMXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQSI achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly lower than DMXF's 11.52% return.
IQSI
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 9.26%
- 6M
- 11.32%
- 1Y
- 19.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- —
DMXF
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- —
IQSI vs. DMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSI IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF | 9.26% | 26.95% | 4.84% | 16.21% | -14.76% | 12.70% | 20.37% |
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 11.52% | 22.07% | 3.99% | 20.52% | -19.25% | 10.90% | 23.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQSI and DMXF is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between IQSI and DMXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
IQSI vs. DMXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQSI
DMXF
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
-
Financial Services
IQSI
DMXF
Industrials
IQSI
DMXF
Technology
IQSI
DMXF
Healthcare
IQSI
DMXF
Consumer Cyclical
IQSI
DMXF
Consumer Defensive
IQSI
DMXF
Basic Materials
IQSI
DMXF
Communication Services
IQSI
DMXF
Utilities
IQSI
DMXF
Real Estate
IQSI
DMXF
Energy
IQSI
DMXF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQSI vs. DMXF — Risk / Return Rank
IQSI
DMXF
IQSI vs. DMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQSI | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.64 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 6.16 | -0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQSI | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.21 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.39 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.65 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
IQSI vs. DMXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQSI drawdown since its inception was -31.90%, smaller than the maximum DMXF drawdown of -34.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSI and DMXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQSI | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.90% | -34.52% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.00% | -11.84% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | -16.54% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.86% | -34.52% | +4.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -0.56% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -7.67% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 3.15% | +0.12% |
Volatility
IQSI vs. DMXF - Volatility Comparison
IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) have volatilities of 4.89% and 5.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQSI | DMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 5.13% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.58% | 13.29% | -0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 16.07% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 17.68% | -1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 17.25% | +1.75% |
IQSI vs. DMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQSI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DMXF's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IQSI vs. DMXF - Dividend Comparison
IQSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than DMXF's 4.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 4.35% | 4.85% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.37% | 1.91% | 0.31% |
IQSI IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF | 2.50% | 2.75% | 2.79% | 2.98% | 2.89% | 2.75% | 1.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, IQSI and DMXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DMXF has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to IQSI (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSI dropped -31.90% vs DMXF's -34.52%.
On 5-year performance, IQSI leads with 7.66% vs 6.83% for DMXF. On fees, DMXF is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, IQSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IQSI has performed better with a 7.66% return vs 6.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DMXF is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IQSI.
DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 2.50% for IQSI.
IQSI tracks IQ Candriam ESG International Equity Index, while DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IQSI and 0.12% for DMXF.
IQSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQSI and DMXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer