IQQ0.DE vs. XDWH.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IQQ0.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L).
IQQ0.DE and XDWH.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IQQ0.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Minimum Volatility. It was launched on Nov 30, 2012. XDWH.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016. Both IQQ0.DE and XDWH.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IQQ0.DE or XDWH.L.
Key characteristics
| IQQ0.DE | XDWH.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.49% | 14.93% |
| 1Y Return | 14.64% | 19.37% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.76% | 5.63% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.81% | 11.30% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.97 | 0.51 |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.71% | 35.93% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.65% | -26.24% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.99% | -1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQ0.DE and XDWH.L is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IQQ0.DE vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IQQ0.DE having a 14.49% return and XDWH.L slightly higher at 14.93%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IQQ0.DE vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQ0.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IQQ0.DE vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IQQ0.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IQQ0.DE vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IQQ0.DE nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IQQ0.DE vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQ0.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ0.DE and XDWH.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IQQ0.DE vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IQQ0.DE) is 2.57%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) has a volatility of 2.71%. This indicates that IQQ0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.