PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IQM vs. XLK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


IQMXLK
YTD Return31.86%23.33%
1Y Return47.63%33.30%
3Y Return (Ann)6.13%13.18%
Sharpe Ratio1.951.50
Sortino Ratio2.512.02
Omega Ratio1.341.27
Calmar Ratio2.261.92
Martin Ratio8.386.63
Ulcer Index5.72%4.91%
Daily Std Dev24.66%21.65%
Max Drawdown-44.91%-82.05%
Current Drawdown-0.86%-0.53%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between IQM and XLK is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

IQM vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IQM achieves a 31.86% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 23.33% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.85%
13.75%
IQM
XLK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IQM vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio.


IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
Expense ratio chart for IQM: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%
Expense ratio chart for XLK: current value at 0.13% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.13%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IQM vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IQM, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.95
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IQM, currently valued at 2.51, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.51
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IQM, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IQM, currently valued at 2.26, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IQM, currently valued at 8.38, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.38
XLK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLK, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.50
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLK, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLK, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLK, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.92
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLK, currently valued at 6.63, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.63

IQM vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQM Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQM and XLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.95
1.50
IQM
XLK

Dividends

IQM vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%1.75%1.70%

Drawdowns

IQM vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQM drawdown since its inception was -44.91%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQM and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.86%
-0.53%
IQM
XLK

Volatility

IQM vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) at 6.20%. This indicates that IQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.28%
6.20%
IQM
XLK